1958
DOI: 10.1148/70.1.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roentgen Diagnosis of Sex Based on Adult Skull Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of confidence of our results (99.99%) is far above those of Ceballos and Rentschler [ 19] and Giles and Elliot [20] in the human: the former predict the sex with a level of confidence of 80-90%, from measurements of radiological parameters; the latter, working on various discriminating measurements of the cranium, reach a level of confidence of 85%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…The level of confidence of our results (99.99%) is far above those of Ceballos and Rentschler [ 19] and Giles and Elliot [20] in the human: the former predict the sex with a level of confidence of 80-90%, from measurements of radiological parameters; the latter, working on various discriminating measurements of the cranium, reach a level of confidence of 85%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…The sex determination by craniometry in lateral and/or PA cephalometric radiography has been studied in different populations, mostly with discriminant function analysis (DFA) than logical regression analysis (LRA). Ceballos and Rentschler[ 13 ] in 1958 utilized means and bar charts analyses for sex determination using four measurements obtained from PA cephalometric radiography of 200 Caucasian adult patients (100 males and 100 females) and achieved 88% accuracy. Townsend, Richards, and Carrol[ 7 ] in 1982 studied the DFA for sex determination in 15 measurements of both PA and lateral cephalometric radiographies of 80 Australian aboriginal adult patients (40 males and 40 females) and achieved 80% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This practice was important to paleoanthropologists, forensic pathologists and anatomists for the study and identification of bones from humans of unknown age, sex and racial group 22 . With the introduction of x-ray radiography, standardized views (cephalograms) allowed www.nature.com/scientificreports/ for more standardized measurements to aid in the study, diagnosis and management of trauma, orthognathic conditions and congenital deformity affecting the facial skeleton 23 . 3D computed tomography brought even more power to the study of anatomy, opening the door to reconstruction of images into a more intuitive 3D framework that can differentiate soft tissue from bone and that allows for more reproducible measurements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%