Medial osteoarthritis of the knee is associated with varus deformity and an abnormal load through the medial compartment. Proximal tibial osteotomy can restore the mechanical axis and correct the abnormal load.1,2 Good long-term results depend on the ultimate correction, which is ideally 2° to 8° of valgus of the mechanical axis. [3][4][5][6] There are several reports of good results achieved by closedwedge osteotomy, 3-5,7-9 but this procedure is technically demanding. The outcome is unpredictable and the period of convalescence lengthy. 7,9-11 In addition, access to the lateral compartment may be difficult after previous tibial osteotomy, 12,13 and even in the younger age group some surgeons carry out a primary arthroplasty rather than an osteotomy. 14-16 Open-wedge osteotomy by hemicallotasis (HCO) is simpler and requires a shorter rehabilitation period.
17,18We have compared in a randomised, prospective study the results and complications of closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and HCO.
Patients and MethodsWe randomly allocated 46 patients (14 women and 32 men) to either HTO (n = 25) or HCO (n=25). The two groups were similar in age, gender, preoperative grade of arthritis and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) ( Table I). The median age was 55 years (40 to 68) in the HTO group and 55 years (38 to 64) in the HCO group. The median range of movement was 125° (105 to 140) in the HTO group and 130° (90 to 150) in the HCO group. Bilateral surgery was carried out on four patients, one of whom was randomised to HTO on both sides. The other three had HTO on one side and HCO on the other. There was a median interval of nine months (2.5 to 14) between the two operations. Surgeons of equal experience and skill carried out the procedures.The indication for surgery was pain in younger, active patients with medial arthritis of grade 1 to 3. 19 We aimed to achieve an overcorrection to an HKA of 4° of valgus in both groups. The correction of 4 ± 2° of valgus was considered optimal.