2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.01824
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rogers' mean value theorem for $S$-arithmetic Siegel transform and applications to the geometry of numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to translate Theorem 1.2 into the classical language, and unsurprisingly, certain recently proved variants of the Rogers formula (e.g., [1,14]) follow immediately this way. Let us also demonstrate a quick example involving a number field other than ℚ.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is easy to translate Theorem 1.2 into the classical language, and unsurprisingly, certain recently proved variants of the Rogers formula (e.g., [1,14]) follow immediately this way. Let us also demonstrate a quick example involving a number field other than ℚ.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Proof of Theorem 5.1. We will follow the strategy of the proof of Theorem 2.10 in [17], which is based on the Borel-Cantelli lemma. We first fix an arbitrary compact set K in UL d (Q S ).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case of forms of rank 3 and 4 was studied by Han in [18]. Effective results for generic (homogeneous) forms in the S-arithmetic setting were obtained by Han in [17], who also established an S-arithmetic version of Rogers' mean value formula. Finally, we mention that the question of values of rational quadratic forms with congruence conditions has also received attention recently, see for instance [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, there are versions for the rational points on Grassmannians ( [14]), translation surfaces ( [43], see also related [2]), and for cut-and-project sets ( [27]), the latter two proved by ergodic theoretic methods. There are also extensions to S-unit lattices ( [11]), to ASL(n, R) ( [8], [1]), and to sums over translates of Z n ( [10], [1]), which requires one to consider the quotient of SL(n, R) with respect to a congruence subgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%