2022
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2022.3143001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rogue Wave Generation Through Nonlinear Self-Interaction of Electrostatic Waves in Dense Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This force is behind the formation of the nanohillocks. Equation (17), which is the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, alters the amplitude of the electron envelope wave packet, denoted as N e . Consequently, the propagation and stability of the envelope wave packet are contingent upon the dispersion coefficient P and the nonlinear coefficient Q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This force is behind the formation of the nanohillocks. Equation (17), which is the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, alters the amplitude of the electron envelope wave packet, denoted as N e . Consequently, the propagation and stability of the envelope wave packet are contingent upon the dispersion coefficient P and the nonlinear coefficient Q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is of significance to us to identify the region that was responsible for the creation of the rogue wave, which will be explained in the next section. At this point, it is essential to jot down the mathematical solution to equation (17), which provides us with a solution for rogue waves as [31]…”
Section: Experimental and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, simulating in main loop with drift (and applied some periodic boundary conditions) we obtain the twostream instability in phase space. Such instabilities can be explained elaborately in the light of studies carried out by some authors [53][54][55][56][57] using dynamical systems.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%