2015
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2014.923777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role Analysis in Networks Using Mixtures of Exponential Random Graph Models

Abstract: A novel and flexible framework for investigating the roles of actors within a network is introduced. Particular interest is in roles as defined by local network connectivity patterns, identified using the ego-networks extracted from the network. A mixture of Exponential-family Random Graph Models is developed for these ego-networks in order to cluster the nodes into roles. We refer to this model as the ego-ERGM. An Expectation-Maximization algorithm is developed to infer the unobserved cluster assignments and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, likelihood-based inference is provided by Markov chain Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood (MCMC-MLE) algorithms (Corander, Dahmström, and Dahmström 1998; Crouch, Wasserman, and Trachtenberg 1998; Besag 2000; Handcock 2000; Snijders 2002) as well as pseudolikelihood procedures (Strauss and Ikeda 1990; Wasserman and Pattison 1996), though there are important objections to the latter (Besag 2000; Snijders 2002). Important to the analysis of social processes, many extensions to the ERGM have allowed for role analysis (Salter-Townshend and Brendan Murphy 2015) and the consideration of egocentrically sampled network data (Krivitsky, Handcock, and Morris 2011). In addition, this family of models is developing to consider longitudinal or dynamic networks in the form of temporal ERGMs (TERGMs) (Hanneke and Xing 2007; Hanneke, Fu, and Xing 2010; Desmarais and Cranmer 2010; Cranmer and Desmarais 2011) and separable temporal ERGMs (STERGMs) (Krivitsky and Handcock 2014; Christenson and Box-Steffensmeier 2016).…”
Section: The Ergm and Frailty Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, likelihood-based inference is provided by Markov chain Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood (MCMC-MLE) algorithms (Corander, Dahmström, and Dahmström 1998; Crouch, Wasserman, and Trachtenberg 1998; Besag 2000; Handcock 2000; Snijders 2002) as well as pseudolikelihood procedures (Strauss and Ikeda 1990; Wasserman and Pattison 1996), though there are important objections to the latter (Besag 2000; Snijders 2002). Important to the analysis of social processes, many extensions to the ERGM have allowed for role analysis (Salter-Townshend and Brendan Murphy 2015) and the consideration of egocentrically sampled network data (Krivitsky, Handcock, and Morris 2011). In addition, this family of models is developing to consider longitudinal or dynamic networks in the form of temporal ERGMs (TERGMs) (Hanneke and Xing 2007; Hanneke, Fu, and Xing 2010; Desmarais and Cranmer 2010; Cranmer and Desmarais 2011) and separable temporal ERGMs (STERGMs) (Krivitsky and Handcock 2014; Christenson and Box-Steffensmeier 2016).…”
Section: The Ergm and Frailty Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These practical limitations do not subvert the issue that multicollinearity in ERGM can yield similar estimation problems as in any statistical model: skewed regression coefficients and biased standard errors. Moreover, unique collinearity-type problems arise when using ERGM (Snijders et al 2006;Dekker, Krakhardt, and Snijders 2007;Salter-Townshend and Murphy 2015). First, the reliance of dyadic dependent ERGMs on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) means that highly collinear estimates may result in multiple models from which the best fitted model cannot be determined (Chandrasekhar and Jackson 2014).…”
Section: List Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicollinearity may be particularly difficult to detect with the inclusion of dyadic dependent terms (Snijders et al 2004;Salter-Townshend and Murphy 2015). This is because endogenous network statistics largely depend on the network's density, which functions equivalently to the intercept in OLS regression (Robins et al 2007;Faust 2007;Lusher et al 2013).…”
Section: List Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, highly collinear models may have multiple solutions to the likelihood function. In such cases, a single ERGM specification may result in multiple models from which the best fitted model cannot be determined (Hunter et al 2008;Salter-Townshend and Murphy 2015). Second, variance estimates calculated through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) may be unstable when collinearity exists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%