2022
DOI: 10.3342/kjorl-hns.2022.00332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role and Recent Trend of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring During Parathyroidectomy in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Abstract: In the last few decades, the standard surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has shifted from bilateral neck exploration to focused/minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (FMIP). This shift was accelerated by the introduction of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring, which can provide intraoperative information regarding the localization and complete excision of the pathological parathyroid gland during FMIP. Since the first clinical application of the IOPTH assay in 1991, IOPT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
2
4

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, IO-PTH confirmed surgical success of focused parathyroidectomy in all cases (100%) and highlights the accuracy of the Miami criterion for predicting surgical cure. This is higher than that reported in other studies (97–98%) [ 9 , 17 ] and may largely be explained by having a highly experienced, dedicated parathyroid surgeon. However, IO-PTH was only done in one third of the surgical group, highlighting the need to confirm this in a larger group and to evaluate emerging alternate criteria [ 9 , 17 19 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, IO-PTH confirmed surgical success of focused parathyroidectomy in all cases (100%) and highlights the accuracy of the Miami criterion for predicting surgical cure. This is higher than that reported in other studies (97–98%) [ 9 , 17 ] and may largely be explained by having a highly experienced, dedicated parathyroid surgeon. However, IO-PTH was only done in one third of the surgical group, highlighting the need to confirm this in a larger group and to evaluate emerging alternate criteria [ 9 , 17 19 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…This is higher than that reported in other studies (97–98%) [ 9 , 17 ] and may largely be explained by having a highly experienced, dedicated parathyroid surgeon. However, IO-PTH was only done in one third of the surgical group, highlighting the need to confirm this in a larger group and to evaluate emerging alternate criteria [ 9 , 17 19 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…In this study, IO-PTH con rmed surgical success of focused parathyroidectomy in all cases (100%) and highlights the accuracy of the Miami criterion for predicting surgical cure. This is higher than that reported in other studies (97-98%) (9,17) and may largely be explained by having a highly experienced dedicated parathyroid surgeon. However, IO-PTH was only done in one third of the surgical group, highlighting the need to con rm this in a larger group and to evaluate emerging alternate criteria (9,(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…This is higher than that reported in other studies (97-98%) (9,17) and may largely be explained by having a highly experienced dedicated parathyroid surgeon. However, IO-PTH was only done in one third of the surgical group, highlighting the need to con rm this in a larger group and to evaluate emerging alternate criteria (9,(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…In 2016, the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) strongly recommended the use of IOPTH in minimally invasive parathyroidectomy to reduce operative failure [1]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that IOPTH monitoring may be helpful in guiding challenging parathyroid surgery such as in cases of parathyroid hyperplasia and tertiary hyperparathyroidism [20, 21]. Outside of primary hyperparathyroidism, however, there is little standardization and consensus in the utility of IOPTH monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%