2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30557-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role-Based Declarative Synchronization for Reconfigurable Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two approaches to such separation of concerns have been developed within our project: (1) static [24], in which synchronization policy (that may include isolation) is declared between components using concurrency combina-tors, and (2) dynamic [23], in which synchronization policy is declared between semantic rôles using abstract types. In [24], we defined a property, called composition safety, that informally means that any runtime execution of a protocol can satisfy the synchronization policy declared using the language of concurreny combinators.…”
Section: Language Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches to such separation of concerns have been developed within our project: (1) static [24], in which synchronization policy (that may include isolation) is declared between components using concurrency combina-tors, and (2) dynamic [23], in which synchronization policy is declared between semantic rôles using abstract types. In [24], we defined a property, called composition safety, that informally means that any runtime execution of a protocol can satisfy the synchronization policy declared using the language of concurreny combinators.…”
Section: Language Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%