1994
DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06336.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role for poliovirus protease 2A in cap independent translation.

Abstract: Viral protein synthesis in poliovirus infected cells was found to be influenced by mutations in part of the viral 5′‐non‐coding region (NCR) in a temperature dependent manner. At elevated temperatures these mutations resulted in virus titre reductions that allowed selection of revertant viruses. Some revertants were found to have retained the 5′‐NCR mutations but had compensating mutations in the 2A protease gene that were responsible for the suppression of the temperature sensitive phenotypes. The mutations i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 2A pro proteolytic activity certainly plays a major role, IRES stimulation by a 2A pro active-site mutant incapable of eIF4G cleavage supports transacting functions independent of proteolytic activity. A possible stimulatory role of eIF4G degradation has been ascribed to (i) enhanced efficiency of the C-terminal eIF4G fragment in promoting internal initiation (10,35,38), (ii) IRES repression by intact eIF4G (56), or (iii) translation shutoff of capped messages conveying a competitive advantage to the IRES. Our results do not support a role for 2A…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 2A pro proteolytic activity certainly plays a major role, IRES stimulation by a 2A pro active-site mutant incapable of eIF4G cleavage supports transacting functions independent of proteolytic activity. A possible stimulatory role of eIF4G degradation has been ascribed to (i) enhanced efficiency of the C-terminal eIF4G fragment in promoting internal initiation (10,35,38), (ii) IRES repression by intact eIF4G (56), or (iii) translation shutoff of capped messages conveying a competitive advantage to the IRES. Our results do not support a role for 2A…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it neither contains the amino acid residues (catalytic triad) of the putative active site of 2A proteases of rhino-and enteroviruses (Palmenberg, 1990), nor does it share any significant similarity in its C terminus with cardio-and aphthoviruses (Ryan et al, 1991). In addition, lack of p220 inactivation by HAV and thus failure of host cell shut-off (De Chastonay & Siegl, 1987) suggest that 2A of HAV has features distinct from that of poliovirus 2A Macadam et al, 1994). This is consistent with the idea that the diverse functions of a related gene product encoded by different picornaviruses may result from the varied requirements of the virus for growth in different host cells (Kong et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first cleavage occurs in cis, while the polyprotein is still being synthesized on polysomes, separating the precursor of structural protein P1 from 2A pro itself (27). The second 2A promediated cleavage is less efficient and occurs on the 3CD pro precursor to generate two alternative products, 3CЈ and 3DЈ, of still unknown function (28,29 polyprotein processing and cytotoxicity, 2A pro has been implicated in other steps of the poliovirus replicative cycle, such as enhancement of poliovirus mRNA translation and participation in the RNA replication apparatus, and as a determinant of the mouse neurovirulent phenotype (29,(33)(34)(35)(36). It is remarkable that a protein as small as 2A pro (only 149 amino acids) carries out multiple functions during the virus life cycle, perhaps reflecting a common strategy followed by viruses to condense their genetic information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%