2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role for Visual Experience in the Development of Direction-Selective Circuits

Abstract: SUMMARYVisually-guided behavior can depend critically on detecting the direction of object movement. This computation is first performed in the retina where direction is encoded by direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) that respond strongly to an object moving in the preferred direction and weakly to an object moving in the opposite, or null, direction (reviewed in [1]). These DSGCs come in multiple types that are classified based on their morphologies, response properties and targets in the brain. This s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…What kind of mechanisms could establish the tuned glutamate releases that are aligned with all four cardinal directions even though ACh releases from starburst cells at individual synaptic sites represent more than the cardinal directions (Figure S4M)? Notably, activity-dependent (Bos et al, 2016) and protocadherin-dependent (Kostadinov and Sanes, 2015) mechanisms have been suggested to facilitate the clustering of preferred directions of DSGCs. Similar molecular and/or cellular mechanisms that restrict the angle of inputs may be at work selectively at tuned boutons in the bipolar cell.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What kind of mechanisms could establish the tuned glutamate releases that are aligned with all four cardinal directions even though ACh releases from starburst cells at individual synaptic sites represent more than the cardinal directions (Figure S4M)? Notably, activity-dependent (Bos et al, 2016) and protocadherin-dependent (Kostadinov and Sanes, 2015) mechanisms have been suggested to facilitate the clustering of preferred directions of DSGCs. Similar molecular and/or cellular mechanisms that restrict the angle of inputs may be at work selectively at tuned boutons in the bipolar cell.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 The development of selectivity for direction of motion is highly dependent on visual experience, observed at the cortical level [51][52][53][54] as well as at upstream stages, such as the retina. 55 Furthermore, the representation of direction of motion might be more unstable on a neuronby-neuron basis within the V1 compared with the representation of orientation. 56,57 The use of static stimuli allowed us to demonstrate that experience-mediated improvements in scene representation are observed for stimuli that do not contain motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is becoming increasingly apparent that the mouse visual system can respond to high spatial frequencies in moving stimuli [34], consistent with natural visual behavior [50]. The development of selectivity for direction of motion is highly dependent on visual experience, observed at the cortical level [51][52][53][54] as well as at upstream stages such as the retina [55]. Furthermore, the representation of direction of motion may be more unstable on a neuron-byneuron basis within V1 compared to the representation of orientation [56,57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%