2020
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of advanced left ventricular imaging in adults with aortic stenosis

Abstract: This review focuses on the available data regarding the utility of advanced left ventricular (LV) imaging in aortic stenosis (AS) and its potential impact for optimising the timing of aortic valve replacement. Ejection fraction is currently the only LV parameter recommended to guide intervention in AS. The cut-off value of 50%, recommended for decision-making in asymptomatic patients with AS, is currently under debate. Several imaging parameters have emerged as predictors of disease progression and clinical ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term mortality in patients with recovered average S' was similar to those of patients with pre-TAVI preserved average S', while prognosis remained poorer for patients with persistently reduced S'. This finding suggests once again that several mechanisms may underlie reduced contractile function in severe AS, entailing differential prognostic implications [1,19,20,26,27]. More importantly, it adds up to current literature that demonstrated LV reverse remodeling following TAVI to be a positive marker of favorable long-term outcome [27][28][29] and it points at post-TAVI average S' as a reliable echocardiographic feature able to define the patient's trajectory also within the preserved EF population and at an early assessment, thus providing an over post-TAVI LV mass and EF which recover throughout a longer time course [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Long-term mortality in patients with recovered average S' was similar to those of patients with pre-TAVI preserved average S', while prognosis remained poorer for patients with persistently reduced S'. This finding suggests once again that several mechanisms may underlie reduced contractile function in severe AS, entailing differential prognostic implications [1,19,20,26,27]. More importantly, it adds up to current literature that demonstrated LV reverse remodeling following TAVI to be a positive marker of favorable long-term outcome [27][28][29] and it points at post-TAVI average S' as a reliable echocardiographic feature able to define the patient's trajectory also within the preserved EF population and at an early assessment, thus providing an over post-TAVI LV mass and EF which recover throughout a longer time course [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Long-term mortality in patients with recovered average S' was similar to those of patients with pre-TAVI preserved average S', while prognosis remained poorer for patients with persistently reduced S'. This nding suggests once again that several mechanisms may underlie reduced contractile function in severe AS, entailing differential prognostic implications 1,19,20,26,27 . More importantly, it adds up to current literature that demonstrated LV reverse remodeling following TAVI to be a positive marker of favorable long-term outcome [27][28][29] and it points at post-TAVI average S' as a reliable echocardiographic feature able to de ne the patient's trajectory also within the preserved EF population and at an early assessment, thus providing an advantage over post-TAVI LV mass and EF which recover throughout a longer time course 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging is the medical imaging modality that provides the best tissue characterization. CMR studies using late gadolinium enhancement imaging, native T1 mapping and determination of extracellular volume (ECV), by native and postgadolinium T1 mapping, have demonstrated the ability of CMR to detect scarring and oedema in patients with AS [42][43][44]. It sounds reasonable that patients with evidence of intracardiac scars and/or oedema…”
Section: Relevant Aspects Of Assessment Of Aortic Valve By Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%