1994
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90450-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of angiotensin AT1 receptor in the cardiovascular response to footshock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 In particular, it has been shown that central or systemic administration of AT 1 receptor antagonists attenuated the increase in blood pressure and plasma catecholamine levels caused by several psycho-and physico-emotional stressors in rats and rabbits. 12,[24][25][26] Our data extend these findings by showing that targeted deletion of the AT 1A receptor gene selectively attenuates the pressor response to stress in mice. Taken together, the above pharmacological and functional genomic studies strongly suggest that AT 1 receptors, and specifically AT 1A subtype for murines, are required for full expression of the cardiovascular component of fight-or-flight response.…”
Section: Stress Responsesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…5,6 In particular, it has been shown that central or systemic administration of AT 1 receptor antagonists attenuated the increase in blood pressure and plasma catecholamine levels caused by several psycho-and physico-emotional stressors in rats and rabbits. 12,[24][25][26] Our data extend these findings by showing that targeted deletion of the AT 1A receptor gene selectively attenuates the pressor response to stress in mice. Taken together, the above pharmacological and functional genomic studies strongly suggest that AT 1 receptors, and specifically AT 1A subtype for murines, are required for full expression of the cardiovascular component of fight-or-flight response.…”
Section: Stress Responsesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…5 In the present study we demonstrate that in addition to its inhibitory action on vasopressor response to footshocks, systemic or central angiotensin AT 1 receptors blockade with losartan, caused a vasodepressor response to footshocks. The vasodepressor response unmasked in the presence of losartan was blocked by peripheral or central injection of PD 123319, which is known to be a specific angiotensin AT 2 receptor antagonist, 33 thus supporting the hypothesis that the vasodepressor response is mediated, in part, by activation of the angiotensin Journal of Human Hypertension AT 2 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The concept of a functional role of angiotensin AT 1 receptor in the regulation of sympathetic activity is supported by our previous findings showing that central or peripheral administration of losartan causes inhibition of the vasopressor response elicited by footshocks. 5 Vascular actions of the angiotensin AT 1 antagonist may not be entirely due to blockade of the angiotensin AT 1 receptor. Angiotensin receptors comprise two major subtypes, AT 1 and AT 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between Ang II and SNS occurs most likely on sympathetic activity resides at the prejunctional AT 1 receptors located at the sympathetic nerve terminals, where the facilitatory input of endogenous Ang II would be blunted by blockade with losartan. 13 Thus, it is plausible to conceive that the inhibitory action of losartan on the Ang II-induced facilitation of noradrenergic transmission during sympathoadrenal stimulation induced by footshocks could be attributed to the blocking of any interaction between Ang II and its AT 1 receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 After drug treatment, the animals were transferred to a Plexiglas chamber with a copper rod floor where they received mild footshocks (2.0 Hz, 100 V, 5 ms, for 5 min) delivered by a Grass stimulator (Model S48). The rats were placed into the heating oven and after 10 min of heating, footshock-stimulation was performed inside the oven for a period of 5 min.…”
Section: Quantification Of Cardiovascular Responses To Footshocksmentioning
confidence: 99%