2016
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.325.10362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of bevacizumab in the prevention of early postoperative haemorrhage after 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery

Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the effect of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab injection on the incidence of postoperative haemorrhage and visual prognosis, in patients undergoing 25-gauge micro incision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) for diabetic vitreous haemorrhage.Methods:One hundred and twenty two eyes of 122 patients of diabetic retinopathy of both genders and aged over 18 years, who presented with non-resolving vitreous haemorrhage were enrolled for this study. All patients received an intravitreal injection of 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravitreal injections (IVIs) have become part of the standard regimen for inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thereby, managing and improving the visual prognosis in cases of diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, etc. [ 1 2 ] Whereas IVIs are largely safe to use, they do run a slight risk of unwanted side effects including sterile inflammation, intraocular pressure elevation, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and vitreous hemorrhage. [ 3 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravitreal injections (IVIs) have become part of the standard regimen for inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thereby, managing and improving the visual prognosis in cases of diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, etc. [ 1 2 ] Whereas IVIs are largely safe to use, they do run a slight risk of unwanted side effects including sterile inflammation, intraocular pressure elevation, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, and vitreous hemorrhage. [ 3 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though previous studies looked at best-corrected vision (BCVA) as a major outcome measure, they evaluated this in terms of residual VH and not central macular thickness (CMT) in this subgroup of treatment-naïve eyes. [ 9 17 18 19 ] Even though the outcomes in these eyes are expected to be excellent with timely pars plana vitrectomy and endolaser, the CMT, incidence of center-involving diabetic macular edema (ciDME), and BCVA at the 1-month postoperative time point in relation to the anatomic macular features have not been elucidated well. Additionally, the need for adjuvant intravitreal pharmacotherapy up to 6 months follow-up after vitrectomy and influence of preoperative anti-VEGF on this has also not been studied well in this subgroup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%