2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010wr010375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of channel and floodplain cross‐section geometry in the basin response

Abstract: [1] We investigate the role of cross-section geometry in flow routing by developing an analytical framework based on the instantaneous response function (IRF) and relationships of river basin geomorphology. The cross-section geometry is included explicitly within the framework by assuming a power law cross section that is, in turn, used to derive expressions for the at-a-site hydraulic geometry. The analysis performed using the Illinois River basin indicates that the cross-section geometry takes on different r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive analysis has been carried out to understand and characterize dispersion mechanisms in natural catchments based on the theory of transport by travel times [1,7,17,26,27,33,35,36]. For stream networks, the approach was pioneered by [26] with the notion of geomorphological dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive analysis has been carried out to understand and characterize dispersion mechanisms in natural catchments based on the theory of transport by travel times [1,7,17,26,27,33,35,36]. For stream networks, the approach was pioneered by [26] with the notion of geomorphological dispersion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the scaling exponent for 〈 L 〉 is 0.85 (Figure c). In natural stream networks, with pronounced dendritic patterns, the scaling exponent for 〈 L 〉 tends to be closer to 0.60 (Mejia & Reed, ). However, for elongated (parallel) natural networks, typical of dryland regions, the scaling exponent tends to be greater than 0.6 (Jung & Ouarda, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies were based on the hypothesis of constant wave celerity both in space and in time [ Gupta et al ., ; Rinaldo et al ., ], and subsequent efforts included flow speed variation in space, according to the river reach physical characteristics such as the slope and the cross‐section shape, but not in time [ Saco and Kumar , ; Grimaldi et al ., ; White et al ., ; Olivera and Koka , ; Li and Sivapalan , ]. It was only recently that the influence of river hydraulics, including floodplains, on the shape of the resulting hydrograph started to be considered [ Snell et al ., ; Mejia and Reed , ; Äkesson et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%