An important question in human genetics is the extent to which genes causing monogenic forms of disease harbor common variants that may contribute to the more typical form of that disease. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the extent to which common variation in the six known maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) genes, which cause a monogenic form of type 2 diabetes, is associated with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, we determined patterns of common sequence variation in the genes encoding Gck, Ipf1, Tcf2, and NeuroD1 (MODY2 and MODY4 -MODY6, respectively), selected a comprehensive set of 107 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that captured common variation, and genotyped each in 4,206 patients and control subjects from Sweden, Finland, and Canada (including family-based studies and unrelated case-control subjects). All SNPs with a nominal P value <0.1 for association to type 2 diabetes in this initial screen were then genotyped in an additional 4,470 subjects from North America and Poland. Of 30 nominally significant SNPs from the initial sample, 8 achieved consistent results in the replication sample. We found the strongest effect at rs757210 in intron 2 of TCF2, with corrected P values <0.01 for an odds ratio (OR) of 1.13. This association was observed again in an independent sample of 5,891 unrelated case and control subjects and 500 families from the U.K., for an overall OR of 1.12 and a P value <10 ؊6 in >15,000 samples. We combined these results with our previous studies on HNF4␣ and TCF1 and explicitly tested for gene-gene interactions among these variants and with several known type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci, and we found no genetic interactions between these six genes. We conclude that although rare variants in these six genes explain most cases of MODY, common variants in these same genes contribute very modestly, if at all, to the common form of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 56:685-693, 2007 C ommon human diseases, like diabetes, cancer, and heart disease, are heritable, and yet to date only a fraction of their genetic predisposition has been explained. Positional cloning using linkage analysis in families has been successful in pinpointing the genes that cause Mendelian disorders, but it has been much less effective in identifying causative alleles in more common diseases. Many common diseases have rare Mendelian forms (rev. in 1). Studying the genes that cause these rare disorders has provided insight into the molecular biology of common diseases, often identifying novel proteins, pathways, and mechanisms. The extent to which the same genes that are responsible for monogenic cases also explain inherited risk of the more common form of each disease remains an open question.Two genes with widely replicated association to the common form of type 2 diabetes, KIR6.2 and PPAR␥, carry rare mutations that cause Mendelian disorders of glucose metabolism: neonatal diabetes (rev. in 2) and PPAR␥ ligand resistance syndrome (3), respectively. The Mendelian disease most phenotypically similar t...