2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2ra22343k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of deoxy group on the high concentration of graphene in surfactant/water media

Abstract: Graphene nanosheets have been successfully dispersed via surfactant-assisted exfoliation of graphite using sodium cholate (SC) and sodium deoxycholate (SDC) surfactants in aqueous media. The concentration of SC and SDC surfactants and saturated graphite concentration have been well optimized to highly disperse graphene in water. The concentration of dispersed graphene in water has been estimated to be 0.52 and 2.58 mg mL 21 for SC and SDC respectively. The absence of an oxygen molecule at the centre aromatic r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AFM is considered as one of the direct methods for estimating the thickness of graphene sheets. 26 AFM images of dispersions coated on Si substrates are shown in Fig. 2(a) to 2(e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFM is considered as one of the direct methods for estimating the thickness of graphene sheets. 26 AFM images of dispersions coated on Si substrates are shown in Fig. 2(a) to 2(e).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The low value of I D /I G , (0.46) indicates that exfoliated graphene sheets are of good quality with low defect content in comparison to literature reports for graphene (I D /I G $ 0.27-2.0) prepared by the liquid-phase exfoliation method. 16,20,25 The I D /I G value for exfoliated graphene is also lower than that observed for graphene oxide prepared by Hummer's method (I D /I G ÂŒ 1.1-1.5). 26 The shiing of the position of the G band from 1584.8 cm À1 to 1581.7 cm À1 while going from graphite to graphene is assigned to the interaction of the hydrophobic part of [C 16 mim][ZnCl 3 ] with the graphene sheets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In particular, a comparative analysis of the interaction of NaC, NaDC and NaTC with (6,5) SWCNTs, showed that NaDC forms the thickest interfacial layer on the CNT surface, and NaTC the most densely packed [45]. On the other hand, NaC and NaDC were used as dispersant of graphene nanosheets, and the absence of an OH group at the centre of the steroidal skeleton in NaDC was found to offer a flat and hydrophobic surface towards the graphene, which helps in the formation of uniform bilayer micelles on the carbon surface, thus making the exfoliation process more efficient [46]. Investigations on the competition of NaC and phenanthrene in the adsorption on graphene highlight the ability of NaC in adsorbing on the graphene surface and its effectiveness in promoting the exfoliation via sonication [47].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The facial amphiphilic structure makes the BSs particularly suitable to exfoliate and disperse the latter nanostructures, avoiding aggregation and reboundling due to the strong π-π interactions among different nanotubes or graphene sheets. Some studies demonstrated that the packing density of natural BSs on specific types of single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs) [45] and their efficiency in exfoliating graphene [46] are dependent on the number of hydroxyl groups of the steroidal skeleton, highlighting their crucial role in the dispersion process. In particular, a comparative analysis of the interaction of NaC, NaDC and NaTC with (6,5) SWCNTs, showed that NaDC forms the thickest interfacial layer on the CNT surface, and NaTC the most densely packed [45].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%