2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of dietary fibre source and meal size on the ileal transit of digesta in growing pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean retention time through the GIT, nutrient and fibre digestibility all increase with the age of pigs (Le Goff et al, 2002;Kim et al, 2007), as longer retention time improves nutrient digestibility. A study (Solà-Oriol et al, 2010) investigating the effect of wheat bran (13%) offered to pigs with white rice or oats found a faster passage rate for oats. The authors concluded that cereal with high fibre content, such as oats, increased passage rate.…”
Section: Gastric Distension and Emptying Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean retention time through the GIT, nutrient and fibre digestibility all increase with the age of pigs (Le Goff et al, 2002;Kim et al, 2007), as longer retention time improves nutrient digestibility. A study (Solà-Oriol et al, 2010) investigating the effect of wheat bran (13%) offered to pigs with white rice or oats found a faster passage rate for oats. The authors concluded that cereal with high fibre content, such as oats, increased passage rate.…”
Section: Gastric Distension and Emptying Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) was used as an indigestible marker in this study to examine the transit of digesta through various segments of the GI tract. Previously, several digestibility studies have used TiO 2 as an indigestible marker (Myers, Ludden, Nayigihugu, & Hess, 2004;Short, Gorton, Wiseman, & Boorman, 1996;Sola-Oriol, Torrallardona, & Gasa, 2010), as an alternative to the most commonly used marker, chromic oxide (Kavanagh, Lynch, O'Mara, & Caffrey, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At day 18 the pigs (48.9 ± 2.3 kg BW) were euthanised for quantitative digesta collection from the stomach, proximal and distal half of the small intestine based on length (further mentioned as proximal or distal small intestine, respectively), caecum, and proximal and distal half of the colon based on length (further mentioned as proximal or distal colon, respectively). After digesta collection, digesta samples were cooled and stored at 4°C pending analyses for dynamic viscosity (analysed within 96 h) and water-binding capacity (WBC; analysed within 24 h), while remaining digesta were stored at −80°C and freeze-dried before analyses for chemical content (DM (19) , CP (N × 6.25, (20) ), starch (21) , reducing sugars (22) , titanium (23) and chromium ( (24) , after sample preparation by Williams et al (25) ). Water-binding capacity of digesta was measured using centrifugal force.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the frequent feeding period, the daily feed allowance was divided in six equal portions. On days 16 and 17, the pigs received (22) from day 8 onwards, and Cr-EDTA (23) as the indigestible soluble marker from day 16 onwards. Diets were fed as mash and mixed with water (1:2.5, w/w) in the feed trough.…”
Section: Diets and Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation