2004
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.61.11.1705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Dopaminergic Treatment in Dopamine Receptor Down-regulation in Advanced Parkinson Disease

Abstract: The down-regulation of dopamine D2 receptors probably relates to the long-term and intermittent administration of dopaminergic treatments rather than to disease progression. This phenomenon is reversed by the complete withdrawal of dopaminergic drugs. Furthermore, an up-regulation of putaminal dopamine D2 receptors is demonstrated in late-stage PD after dopaminergic drug withdrawal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study the 11 C-raclopride binding reduction was not statistically different in both YOPD populations: BP D2 values are lower in the parkin group by 9% of normal values in the putamen and 6% in the caudate, but this difference is not significant, suggesting that chronic exposure to dopaminergic drugs is responsible for a downregulation of dopamine receptors in PD independent of the genetic status of the patients (35). In addition, SPM analysis does not reveal any striatal or extra-striatal difference between the 2 groups for D 2 binding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…However, in the present study the 11 C-raclopride binding reduction was not statistically different in both YOPD populations: BP D2 values are lower in the parkin group by 9% of normal values in the putamen and 6% in the caudate, but this difference is not significant, suggesting that chronic exposure to dopaminergic drugs is responsible for a downregulation of dopamine receptors in PD independent of the genetic status of the patients (35). In addition, SPM analysis does not reveal any striatal or extra-striatal difference between the 2 groups for D 2 binding.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Increased striatal expression of Drd2a is commonly reported in human postmortem (Hurley and Jenner 2006;Joyce 1993;Piggott et al, 1999;Ryoo et al, 1998) and functional studies (Kim et al, 2002;Thobois et al, 2004) of PD, as well as in animal models (Morissette et al 1998;Guillin et al 2001). We did not identify an absolute increase in Drd2 expression in our ak mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The PD with PG group was taking lower chronic DA agonist doses, along with compensatory increases in levodopa doses, in order to retain benefit to PD symptoms. Since both DA agonists and levodopa effect DA receptor expression (Chernoloz et al, 2009;Kaasinen et al, 2000;Pitts et al, 1995;Subramaniam et al, 1992;Thobois et al, 2004) we chose to match groups on total LEDD, but it must be acknowledged that these differences may have influenced our results.…”
Section: Discussion [11c] Flb-457 Bp In the Midbrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two patients with PG were no longer using DA agonists, and the remainder had DA agonists reduced, with concomitant increases in levodopa (Table 2). Thus, we considered it more important to match patients for total levodopa equivalent doses rather than either levodopa or DA agonists, since both may have an impact on DA receptor expression (Chernoloz et al, 2009;Kaasinen et al, 2000;Pitts et al, 1995;Subramaniam et al, 1992;Thobois et al, 2004).…”
Section: Participants and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%