2019
DOI: 10.21608/asmj.2019.101288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusionweighted Mri in Evaluation of Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Chemoembolization.

Abstract: Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounted as the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide and the third most common cancer leading to death. However unfortunately only a minority HCC patients are surgical candidates at the time of diagnosis, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the most commonly used intra-arterial therapies to treat unresectable HCC, Assessing early response to therapy using objective criteria is paramount for clinical care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results about ROC curve analysis were consistent with Guirguis et al [15] found that the sensitivity of dynamic MRI was 95.8%, indicating its ability to accurately detect positive cases. The specificity was 92.9%, indicating its ability to accurately identify negative cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results about ROC curve analysis were consistent with Guirguis et al [15] found that the sensitivity of dynamic MRI was 95.8%, indicating its ability to accurately detect positive cases. The specificity was 92.9%, indicating its ability to accurately identify negative cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Contrast washout was detected in 40(66.7%) cases in portal phase and 63.3% in delayed phase. Our results were supported by Guirguis et al [15] reported that The study of Pre-contrast T 1 revealed that among the 24 cases treated with LR, 25.0% showed heterogeneous T 1 signal intensity and 75% showed low T 1 signal intensity. Additionally, 25.0% showed heterogeneous T 2 signal intensity and 75% showed low T 2 signal intensity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%