2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2020.104186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of eddies on controlling total and size-fractionated primary production in the Bay of Bengal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The role of the Bay of Bengal in primary production in the global ocean -a historical perspective Marine primary producers contribute around 50 % to global net primary production (Behrenfeld et al, 2001), leading to a carbon flux from the atmosphere into the ocean of 45-50 Pg C and up to 90 Pg C yr −1 (Longhurst et al, 1995;Sabine et al, 2004;Sarmiento and Gruber, 2002). Changes in ocean primary production exert an important control on atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations, and thus on global climate (Falkowski et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The role of the Bay of Bengal in primary production in the global ocean -a historical perspective Marine primary producers contribute around 50 % to global net primary production (Behrenfeld et al, 2001), leading to a carbon flux from the atmosphere into the ocean of 45-50 Pg C and up to 90 Pg C yr −1 (Longhurst et al, 1995;Sabine et al, 2004;Sarmiento and Gruber, 2002). Changes in ocean primary production exert an important control on atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations, and thus on global climate (Falkowski et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature suggests that other factors may have contributed to the intensive θ ′ in these regions. An alternative scenario may be that, in these mesotrophic‐eutrophic regions, upwelling in CEs uplifted nutrient‐rich subsurface waters to the near‐surface and promoted the growth of phytoplankton (McGillicuddy et al., 1998; Sarma et al., 2020) (vice versa for AEs, giving rise to the negative C Phyto ′ and Chl′ in Figure 2). This increase in nutrient supply also facilitated the synthesis of intracellular Chl (Arteaga et al., 2016; Halsey & Jones, 2015), thus resulting in positive θ ′.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an increase in nutrient supply may not only promote the division rate of phytoplankton cells but also facilitates the synthesis of intracellular Chl (Arteaga et al., 2016; Halsey & Jones, 2015), resulting in an increase in both phytoplankton biomass and intracellular pigmentation. This paradigm may possibly be responsible for the simultaneous negative C Phyto ′ and positive θ ′ in the midlatitude oceans and boundary current systems, where eddy dynamics were suggested able to apparently alter the vertical supply of nutrients (Huang & Xu, 2018; McGillicuddy et al., 1998; Sarma et al., 2020). In addition, laboratory experiments showed considerable difference in θ for cells grown at 10 and 18 °C across a wide range of irradiances (Thompson, 1999).…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The salinity of BoB is obtained from spatial-gridded Argo data in the sea close to the coast (APDRC 2020). The mean concentration of inorganic nutrients, DIN and DIP of the coastal BoB for the period 2018-2019 was collected based on Sarma et al (2020).…”
Section: Study Area Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%