“…Simple analytical theories based on the random phase approximation (RPA) have partially accounted for the phase behavior of sequence-specific electrostatic interactions for a few specific IDP charge patterns (12-14) and other simple patterns (6,7,33), although the RPA is known to break down at low concentration, so it is unable to reliably predict the dilute branch of polyampholyte-phase diagrams. It should also be noted that the widely applied Voorn-Overbeek model of coacervation (34) neglects the connectivity of charges to the polymeric backbone (31,35,36) and thus is not useful for understanding sequence-dependent self-coacervation phenomena.The phase behavior and chain conformations of nearly chargeneutral alternating, random, and diblock polyampholytes have been studied extensively through scaling arguments, RPA, as well as molecular simulations highlighting the attractive electrostatic fluctuations that cause collapse into globular configurations and phase separation at low concentrations (1, 5-9, 19, 33, 37, 38). These approaches have qualitatively matched experiments on synthetic polyampholytes where the overall charge and sequence of charges are difficult to control (3,4,(39)(40)(41)(42), so the accuracy of these approaches is yet unknown.…”