2004
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of endoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography in diagnosis of submucosal tumor of large intestine

Abstract: AIM:To evaluate the role of miniprobe ultrasonography under colonoscope in the diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the large intestine, and to determine its imaging characteristics. METHODS:Thirty-five patients with submucosal tumors of the large intestine underwent miniprobe ultrasonography under colonoscope. The diagnostic results of miniprobe ultrasonography were compared with pathological findings of specimens by biopsy and surgical resection. RESULTS:Lipomas were visualized as hyperechoic homogeneous masses … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, unfortunately, we are not able to correctly identify this group of patients. Nevertheless, the recent introduction of high-definition 20-MHz through-the-channel miniprobes seems to be a step toward the possibility of preoperatively identifying not only the T stage but also the depth of submucosal invasion [33]. The present series shows a significant difference in recurrence rate between pT1 sm1 (0%) and sm2-3 (22.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, unfortunately, we are not able to correctly identify this group of patients. Nevertheless, the recent introduction of high-definition 20-MHz through-the-channel miniprobes seems to be a step toward the possibility of preoperatively identifying not only the T stage but also the depth of submucosal invasion [33]. The present series shows a significant difference in recurrence rate between pT1 sm1 (0%) and sm2-3 (22.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is difficult to objectively define preoperatively which lesion would better be removed by TEM instead of transabdominal surgery, or even if it would benefit from neoadjuvant therapy, which, associated with TEM, in uT2 lesions was reported to be as effective as abdominal radical surgery [15][16][17][18]. Nevertheless, it must be remembered that our series extended over 15 years and was affected by a great evolution in technology, such as the introduction of EUS 360° probes, an improvement in image definition, and the introduction of high-definition EUS 20-MHz through-the-channel miniprobes [33]. These innovations came together with a growing experience in the EUS technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic ultrasonography can help delineate the size, border and layer of origin of these colonic submucosal lesions and may improve diagnostic accuracy, but the endoscopic appearances may be changed in cases with ulceration and the diagnose may be compromised [3,6,17,18]. Endoscopy was quite useful in our series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As long as the lesions keep on showing benign signs, histopathologic confirmation is not commonly yielded (11). EUS is a valuable procedure for diagnosis and for making decisions on resection for the subepithelial lesions of the upper GI tract (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). It is not possible to obtain deep tissue sampling with standard biopsy forceps, and surgical or endoscopic resection is not necessary for asymptomatic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%