2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Correlation With Surgical Histopathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
3
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
72
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, CEA cannot discern benign from malignant cysts (19). Moreover, it is reported to be equally raised in mucinous cystic neoplasms and in 30% of the samples it is low (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Therefore, the evaluation of serum CEA level is preferred.…”
Section: Current Practice and The Updates On The Genomic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, CEA cannot discern benign from malignant cysts (19). Moreover, it is reported to be equally raised in mucinous cystic neoplasms and in 30% of the samples it is low (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Therefore, the evaluation of serum CEA level is preferred.…”
Section: Current Practice and The Updates On The Genomic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During EUS exams, an endoscopic view of the papilla should be always done to exclude mucin extruding from the patulous papilla (fish mouth papilla), which is diagnostic of IPMN [38] , although this phenomenon is present in only 30% of cases, almost all of which with MD or MIX IPMN [15] . Pais et al [54] showed that in 74 operated patients, EUS features of a solid lesion, a dilated main pancreatic duct, ductal filling defects and thickened septa were predictive of malignancy in IPMNs.…”
Section: Eus In Cystic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maire et al [91] showed, in 41 patients with IPMN, that a CEA level Ͼ200 ng/ml has a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of malignant IPMN of 90%, 71%, 50%, and 96%, respectively. However, another study showed that neither CEA nor cancer antigen 19 -9 were useful to distinguish malignant IPMN from benign IPMN (n ϭ 75) [92]. In summary, the role of tumor markers is still not clear, but if any, CEA seems to be the first choice.…”
Section: Cytology and Laboratory Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%