Role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring anuran communities across a tropical rain forest

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate if anuran species distributions in riparian and non‐riparian areas are influenced by environmental factors (i.e. niche) and/or by spatial factors (i.e. dispersal). The environmental variables analysed were altitude, distance from the stream and leaf litter depth. Spatial factors were represented by the eigenvectors extracted from geographical coordinates by eigenfunction analysis. The study was conducted in 24 km2 of terra‐firme forest in Central Amazonia, Manaus – Amazonas, Brazil. Between November 2008 and May 2009, three samples were taken from 41 plots, 21 plots being placed at non‐riparian areas and another 20 placed in riparian areas. We submitted the assemblage dataset to a partial redundancy analysis to evaluate the contributions of environmental and spatial variables (selected with a forward selection procedure). In addition, we tested if communities differ from riparian and non‐riparian areas using a db‐MANOVA. Species richness and species composition differed between riparian and non‐riparian plots. Some species were restricted to riparian areas. Altitude was the only significant variable (P = 0.005) explaining 21% of the total variance. When analysing the data from all plots using the partial redundancy analysis, 27% of the variance was explained by spatial and environmental variables. The environmental variables explained exclusively 4% of the variance in assemblage composition, and 13% was explained by environmental variables that were also structured in space (i.e. the shared fraction), while 10% was explained exclusively by spatial variables. In conclusion, our results showed differences between the assemblages of riparian and non‐riparian areas which can be explained by the distribution of anuran species along environmental gradients altitude and distance to streams, with little evidence of dispersal limitation.

The Costs of Evaluating Species Densities and Composition of Snakes to Assess Development Impacts in Amazonia

“…The estimated occupancy and detection probabilities describe a history of detecting species over a series of surveys in the same locations [34]. Although the Amazon rainforest is apparently homogeneous on satellite images, subtle changes in habitat features across the landscape at a scale of a few kilometers can influence co-occurrence of species in some taxonomic groups, such as frogs [13], understory birds [12] and snakes [11]. Detection probabilities possibly vary slightly among areas within each module as a function of change in habitat features, such as vegetation density along the trails.…”

A Matter of Scale: Historical and Environmental Factors Structure Anuran Assemblages from the Upper Madeira River, Amazonia

“…, Rojas‐Ahumada et al . ). These findings suggest that, at the local level, the relationships between the environment and amphibian assemblage composition are idiosyncratic.…”

“…, Rojas‐Ahumada et al . ), tree density (Menin et al . , , Condrati ), distance to streams (Condrati , Menin et al .…”

“…, Rojas‐Ahumada et al . ), soil texture (Menin et al . , Condrati ), depth and volume of leaf litter (Menin et al .…”

“…, , Rojas‐Ahumada et al . ), and topography (Menin et al . , ) all have significant effects, though not all to the same degree in different sites.…”