2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70288-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of EUS in the preoperative localization of insulinomas compared with spiral CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
38
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…After that multiple studies of the accuracy of EUS published especially in insulinoma (Schumacher et al, 1996;Anderson et al, 2000;Ardengh et al, 2000;Zimmer et al, 2000;Gouya et al, 2003) with detection rate of 79-94% ,in a recent study 52 patients underwent EUS for detection of insulinoma (according to clinical and laboratory data) that sensitivity was 89.5% and accuracy of 83.7% according to surgical finding . Sensitivity of EUS for detection of lesion ns in the head, body and tail of the pancreas respectively was 92.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that multiple studies of the accuracy of EUS published especially in insulinoma (Schumacher et al, 1996;Anderson et al, 2000;Ardengh et al, 2000;Zimmer et al, 2000;Gouya et al, 2003) with detection rate of 79-94% ,in a recent study 52 patients underwent EUS for detection of insulinoma (according to clinical and laboratory data) that sensitivity was 89.5% and accuracy of 83.7% according to surgical finding . Sensitivity of EUS for detection of lesion ns in the head, body and tail of the pancreas respectively was 92.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may show very small tumours (about 3 mm in size) in the head of the www.intechopen.com pancreas, such tumours being impalpable at surgery. A lower sensitivity for pancreatic tail lesions (37-50%) has been reported (Ardengh et al 2000). Pancreatic nodularities may be mistaken for insulinomas (Kann et al 2003).…”
Section: Topographic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Los dos primeros son los más utilizados, con sensibilidad y especificidad mayores al 90% 4 . Sin embargo, se ha comunicado que la ultrasonografía endoscópica sería el examen que cuenta con la mayor sensibilidad para lesiones menores de 0,5 cm., y que permite obtener información histológica 22 . Con la incorporación del PET/CT, se logra complementar la información morfológica con información funcional 23 , al asociar el comportamiento molecular de la estructura marcada con el radiofármaco, con su ubicación anatómica.…”
Section: Figuraunclassified