EndoscopyThe endoscope is largely seen as a minimally invasive surgical technique, and minimizing the invasiveness in surgery is a general trend, which is for a large number of patients the crucial point when opting for a treatment. Yes, the endoscope is a great tool for improving the visualization in deep and narrow corridors, but seeing the lesion does not automatically enable resecting it. The resection is highly dependent on the maneuverability of the surgical instrument, which is limited by the narrow and deep corridor along the endoscope.
NeuroendoscopyIn the beginning of the neuroendoscopy era, those propagating this technique were criticized that the new technique is not as safe as open microsurgery. Over the years we learned how to select cases, and we can well estimate the risk for a certain endoscopic procedure. Some procedures like ventriculostomy have become routine also in non-specialized neurosurgical units. Although the endoscope was introduced in neurosurgery decades ago, the microscope is still the workhorse for magnification. Especially gliomas are still routinely operated via an open approach; some experienced glioma surgeons prefer loupes over the microscope to gain a better anatomic overview for a superior preservation of function. One of the main challenges in endoscopic glioma surgery, especially in high-grade gliomas, is to control bleeding from the tumor bed. Here again, the limited maneuverability of the bipolar forceps along the endoscope (but also blood spilling on the lens) are the main restrictions. Therefore it is great to see academic groups pushing the field. Brokinkel et al.[1] describe in their case report a thalamic low-grade glioma, which has been resected via a parietal transventricular approach. Their experience in that case was that the transsulcal corridor was too narrow to visualize the tumor with the microscope, but after insertion of a Hopkins endoscope, tumor resection was feasible.
Thalamic low-grade gliomaThalamic gliomas are a rare subset of gliomas, but low-grade thalamic gliomas are even more rare. These deep-seated tumors are challenging to resect, therefore stereotactic biopsy followed by radiation and chemotherapy is considered to be the safer treatment over surgical resection. Comparing biopsy with early resection, a significantly higher 5-year survival has been shown for early resection in low-grade gliomas [2]. Over the last years, a growing body of evidence is in favor of extent of resection of low-grade gliomas to improve overall and progression-free survival [3]. These findings should also be applicable for thalamic low-grade gliomas.