2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in the ureteric bud

Abstract: Fibroblast growth receptors (FGFRs) consist of four signaling family members. Mice with deletions of fgfr1 or fgfr2 are embryonic lethal prior to the onset of kidney development. To determine roles of FGFR1 and FGFR2 in the ureteric bud, we used a conditional targeting approach. First, we generated transgenic mice using the Hoxb7 promoter to drive cre recombinase and green fluorescent protein expression throughout ureteric bud tissue. We crossed Hoxb7creEGFP mice with mice carrying lox-p sites flanking critica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
242
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
242
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 A recent conditional knockout study in which floxed Fgfr2 mice were crossed with HoxB7-Cre mice to inactivate those receptors specifically in the UB lineage reported no UB budding defect, although later kidney development was affected. 26 In the FGF receptor IgG chimera transgenic study, 15 it is possible that no relevant FGFs were available for the WD, whereas in the conditional knockout study, FGF ligands are intact and the possible presence of Fgfr3 or Fgfr4 may be able to transmit the FGF signal to WD cells. Thus, the difference in these two genetic studies might be explained by a lack of FGF signaling BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org (resulting in agenesis) versus the presence of FGF signaling (resulting in normal UB bud formation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 A recent conditional knockout study in which floxed Fgfr2 mice were crossed with HoxB7-Cre mice to inactivate those receptors specifically in the UB lineage reported no UB budding defect, although later kidney development was affected. 26 In the FGF receptor IgG chimera transgenic study, 15 it is possible that no relevant FGFs were available for the WD, whereas in the conditional knockout study, FGF ligands are intact and the possible presence of Fgfr3 or Fgfr4 may be able to transmit the FGF signal to WD cells. Thus, the difference in these two genetic studies might be explained by a lack of FGF signaling BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org (resulting in agenesis) versus the presence of FGF signaling (resulting in normal UB bud formation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SuFu loxP ) and Gli3 ⌬699 (Böse et al, 2002) mice were maintained on a mixed background, and SuFu ϩ/ Ϫ (kindly provided by C.-C. Hui), Hoxb.7-Cre (Zhao et al, 2004), Ptc1 ϩ/ Ϫ (Goodrich et al, 1997) and Ptc1 loxP (Ellis et al, 2003) mice were maintained on a CD1/129 background. ROSA lacZ/lacZ mice (Soriano, 1999) were maintained on a C57BL/6 background.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implied involvement of FGF1 and FGF7 in developmental changes between E10.5 and E13.5, despite no detected changes in levels of transcripts for these factors. Both FGF1 and FGF2 have previously been impli- cated in metanephric development (Perantoni et al, 1995;Barasch et al, 1997;Qiao et al, 2001;Zhao et al, 2004). While the FGFs are secreted via a mechanism distinct from the use of an ER signal peptide (Prudovsky et al, 2003) and hence would not have been included in the soluble/secreted class using our prediction tools, these transcripts were actually not outliers themselves, highlighting the need for parallel analyses of signalling pathways.…”
Section: Ingenuity Pathway Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%