2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of foam drainage in producing protein aggregates in foam fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first study mentioning this process was reported in 1937 by Ostwald and Sierh when they separated albumen from beet and potato juices [8,13,14]. Years later, illuminating works on the subject were discussed in the literature [15][16][17] and the process has since become the target of research [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first study mentioning this process was reported in 1937 by Ostwald and Sierh when they separated albumen from beet and potato juices [8,13,14]. Years later, illuminating works on the subject were discussed in the literature [15][16][17] and the process has since become the target of research [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins in tofu whey were identified as predominantly glycinin, basic 7S globulin, γ-conglycinin, and β-conglycinin (Stanojević et al, 2023), where the more abundant glycinin had more hydrophobic groups on the surface that contributed to higher adsorption of oil/protein on the interface (Riblett et al, 2001). The configuration of hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups contributes to protein agglomeration and drainage during foam fractionation (Li et al, 2017). On the other hand, foam drainage and holdup time are also influenced by the interaction between the foam-protein system and reactor surface, therefore, the use of a hydrophobic surface is envisaged (Liu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Process Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%