2015
DOI: 10.15740/has/au/10.3/245-248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of front line demonstration on transfer of Moong production technologies in Barmer district of Rajasthan

Abstract: Krishi Vigyan Kendra conducted front line demonstration on Moong variety SML668/ IPM02-03/RMG268/GM04 at farmers fields in district Barmer during years 2009-2014. The productivity and economic returns of Moong in demonstrated plots were calculated and compared with the corresponding local check. The data obtained was pooled for five years. It was observed that on an average 35.04 per cent higher grain yield was recorded in demonstration plots than the local check. The extension gap, technology gap and technolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the average technology gap observed was 107 kg/ha. The differences in technology gap over the years ascribed to better performance of recommended varieties with different interventions and more feasibility of recommended technologies (Verma and Dayanand, 2013;Meena and Singh, 2016;Kumawat et al, 2017;Pagaria et al, 2019) [25,11,17,14] . Similarly, the technology index for all demonstrations in the study were in accordance with technology gap.…”
Section: Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the average technology gap observed was 107 kg/ha. The differences in technology gap over the years ascribed to better performance of recommended varieties with different interventions and more feasibility of recommended technologies (Verma and Dayanand, 2013;Meena and Singh, 2016;Kumawat et al, 2017;Pagaria et al, 2019) [25,11,17,14] . Similarly, the technology index for all demonstrations in the study were in accordance with technology gap.…”
Section: Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%