“…The cognitive neuroscience methodologies, especially, offer powerful tools to examine the phenotypic expression of genotypic variation in brain activity (e.g., Edenberg et al, 2004;Filbey et al, 2008;McClernon, Hutchison, Rose, and Kozink, 2007; for a review, see Green et al, 2008). However, there is also promise for many of the other experimental domains reviewed, such as subjective intoxication (e.g., Dlugos et al, 2010;Ray and Hutchison, 2004), cue reactivity (Hutchison et al, 2002;van den Wildenberg et al, 2007), aspects of impulsivity (e.g., Eisenberg et al, 2007;Hamidovic et al, 2009), and even developmental trajectories (e.g., Dick et al, 2009). Although it is highly likely that each of these phenotypes in themselves will be complex, with variation reflecting the influences of tens, hundreds, or even thousands of loci, they may nonetheless be important mechanistic processes that add to our understanding of latent vulnerabilities to addiction.…”