The relative roles of renal pressor and antihypertensive factors in the pathogenesis cf experimental renal hypertension remain a central, and disputed, issue.In our laboratory, we have evolved two strains of rats with opposite genetic predispositions to different forms of experimental hypertension including those produced by salt and unilateral renal artery constriction (1-4). But when a rat from each of the two strains was united in parabiosis, it was found that the reaction pattern to salt hypertension could be changed, i.e., the normally resistant animal not only developed significant hypertension but did so prior to its susceptible partner (5). This was interpreted to indicate that the genetic factors might act via a humoral agent, transmittable between rats from the two strains. The studies did not settle whether such factors were of a pressor or anti-pressor nature.In the current study, we have explored the effects of a variety of renal manipulations in single and parabiotic animals. Our results suggest that, although intact renal tissue has an antihypertensive action, the loss of this function is not alone sufficient to explain renal hypertension; a pressor agent must be involved. Since only animals from the sensitive strain were able to induce experimental hypertension in their intact parabiotic partners, we have speculated that, in animals from the sensitive strain there are two pressor principles: One agent is present in animals from this strain as well as in the one resistant to hypertension and is not transmitted through the parabiosis junction; a second agent is peculiar to the strain predisposed to hypertension and will traverse the junction.
Material and MethodsThe rats belonged to two strains developed in this laboratory, called R and S because of their resistance or sensitivity, respectively, to experimental hypertension.