2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of glutathione S-transferase M1, T1 and P1 gene polymorphisms in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia susceptibility in a Turkish population

Abstract: The variations between different individuals in the xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes' activity were shown to modify susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Polymorphisms associated with genes coding for the glutathione S-transferase (GST) enzyme were known to affect the metabolism of different carcinogens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms, and the GSTP1 Ile105Val single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on the susceptibility to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, outcome of individual studies in this review showed that in distribution of GSTM1 genotype, three had increase risk of association with null genotype [19,27,44] and two had no significant difference in prevalence of null genotype [22,24] whiles one study with a gender stratified analysis showed that the null genotype was over-represented in boys [21]. In environmental exposures of chemical pesticides and tobacco smoke 83.3% shows increase risk of childhood ALL [20,23,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33]] and 16.7% shows no association with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, outcome of individual studies in this review showed that in distribution of GSTM1 genotype, three had increase risk of association with null genotype [19,27,44] and two had no significant difference in prevalence of null genotype [22,24] whiles one study with a gender stratified analysis showed that the null genotype was over-represented in boys [21]. In environmental exposures of chemical pesticides and tobacco smoke 83.3% shows increase risk of childhood ALL [20,23,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33]] and 16.7% shows no association with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Previous studies have reported on the correlation between the GSTP1 gene polymorphism and several kinds of cancers, such as lung cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, breast cancer, skin cancer, head and neck cancer, and oral cancer (Choudhury et al, 2015;Guven et al, 2015;Jaramillo-Rangel et al, 2015;Krüger et al, 2015;Lei et al, 2015;Sharma et al, 2015). For example, Sharma et al (2015) conducted a study in an Indian population, and reported that the null GSTT1 and wild-type GSTP1 genotypes were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sharma et al (2015) conducted a study in an Indian population, and reported that the null GSTT1 and wild-type GSTP1 genotypes were associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. However, Guven et al (2015) suggested that the GST variants might not influence the risk of developing childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a Turkish population. Furthermore, Jaramillo-Rangel et al (2015) reported that the GSTM1-null genotype was associated with breast cancer risk in a Mexican population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 are members of three subfamilies of the GST enzyme. Deletion of the GSTM1 or GSTT1 genes and non-synonymous GSTP1 Ile105Val could affect the expression and activity of the enzymes, and thereby lead to impaired detoxification and cancers (Broekman et al, 2014;Rao et al, 2014;Guven et al, 2015). Previous studies have reported the association between GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer (Tripathi et al, 2008;Nguyen et al, 2010;Yadav et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2011;García-González et al, 2012) with inconsistent results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%