Background
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have significantly improved the early detection of myocardial injury and the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Different diagnostic algorithms exist for the interpretation of hs-cTn in the management of patients with suspected ACS. This study analysed the diagnostic efficacy of hs-cTn using serial and single measurements while also shedding light on the challenges associated with the use of this assay.
Methods
We reviewed 189 results belonging to 120 unique patient episodes and records for troponin tests performed in a two-week period obtained from the West Cumberland Hospital, North Cumbria Integrated Care (NCIC), Whitehaven, England. These troponin tests were carried out based on the NCIC trust guidelines for the use of troponin assays in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A positive troponin test is defined using the NCIC trust guidelines and the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) guidelines. The case notes of the unique patients were reviewed to determine the outcome, which is defined as the clinical diagnosis on discharge of the patient following a cardiologist review. These outcomes were then used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. We also determined the alternate diagnosis for false-positive tests.
Results
Using both guidelines to assess the clinical effectiveness of the troponin assay yields slightly varying results, with the single positive test of NACB demonstrating a higher sensitivity of 92.8% (>71.4%) and a slightly better negative predictive value of 97.8% (>96%). However, using the serial troponin measurements as per the NCIC trust guideline demonstrates a better specificity of 95.2% (>42.4%) and a positive predictive value of 66% (>17.5%). False positive results are identified, which are due to alternate diagnoses such as stable angina, myocarditis, heart failure, sepsis, and malignancy.
Conclusion
High-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) assays play a crucial role in the early detection and management of patients with suspected ACS. This study supports evidence that serial troponin measurements are more diagnostically accurate than single troponin measurements. Although hs-cTn assays offer significant advantages, there remain challenges and limitations that require careful interpretation and clinical correlation.