2007
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.11.2995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Human Papillomavirus Genotype in Prognosis of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Primary Surgery

Abstract: The independent prognostic value of HPV genotype is confirmed in this study. The prognostic models could be useful in counseling patients and stratifying patients in future clinical trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
107
6
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
107
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently reported independent adverse prognostic factors for patients with early-stage cervical cancer after RH include higher FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, parametrial involvement, depth of cervical stromal invasion, tumour size and LVSI (Look et al, 1996;Lai et al, 2007;Kasamatsu et al, 2009). We also found that these factors were significant in univariate analysis, although only lymph node metastasis, parametrial involvement and tumour size were significant in multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Consistently reported independent adverse prognostic factors for patients with early-stage cervical cancer after RH include higher FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, parametrial involvement, depth of cervical stromal invasion, tumour size and LVSI (Look et al, 1996;Lai et al, 2007;Kasamatsu et al, 2009). We also found that these factors were significant in univariate analysis, although only lymph node metastasis, parametrial involvement and tumour size were significant in multivariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…23,[29][30][31] The second point concerns the differential prognostic value of HPV genotypes in invasive cancer. We 16 and others 14,22,28,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] reported an unfavourable outcome of tumours associated with HPV18 as compared with those associated with HPV16 or with intermediate-risk HPV types. In this work, based on the analysis of a larger number of cases with a long follow up, the better outcome of tumours associated with intermediate-risk HPV was confirmed, but the respective prognostic value of HPV18 vs. HPV16 showed little differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion that virtually all cervical cancer were HPV positive 1 has not been confirmed in later studies. Taking into account the overall population of 2,717 patients corresponding to recent reports [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and this study, the global rate of HPV negative invasive carcinoma is 10.1%, ranging from 2% 26 to 26.1%. 24 Several reasons may be evoked to account for potential false negativity of viral analysis (rare or not yet cloned HPV, loss of viral DNA sequences during the tumour process, lack of methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vermutlich lassen sich mit zunehmender Datenlage auch bezüglich des Überlebens der Tumorpatienten Unterschiede zwischen den einzelnen Subtypen definieren. So ist beim Zervixkarzinom insbesondere HPV18 mit einer schlechteren Prognose assoziiert worden [14]. Auch ist zu bedenken, dass zunehmend auch HPV-Typen der Niedrigrisikogruppe mit malignen Tumorerkrankungen assoziiert wurden, sodass zwar mit einem geringeren Krebsrisiko als bei den Hochrisikotypen zu rechnen ist, dieses aber keinesfalls unberücksichtigt bleiben sollte (.…”
Section: Diskussio N Und Schlussfo Lgerungenunclassified