Clinical Pancreatology 2004
DOI: 10.1002/9780470987506.ch28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Imaging Methods in Diagnosing, Staging, and Detecting Complications of Chronic Pancreatitis in Clinical Practice: Should MRCP and MRI Replace ERCP and CT?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its good correlation with ERCP has been demonstrated, and it seems likely to become a promising alternative to diagnostic ERCP. [6][7][8][9] Imaging features of early chronic pancreatitis shown by MRCP are similar to those obtained by ERCP and include side-branch ectasia, mild ductal dilatation, loss of the normal gentle tapering of the duct toward the tail, and mural irregularities (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Ductal Systemmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its good correlation with ERCP has been demonstrated, and it seems likely to become a promising alternative to diagnostic ERCP. [6][7][8][9] Imaging features of early chronic pancreatitis shown by MRCP are similar to those obtained by ERCP and include side-branch ectasia, mild ductal dilatation, loss of the normal gentle tapering of the duct toward the tail, and mural irregularities (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Ductal Systemmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It has been claimed that the results of MRI and MRCP correlate well with those of computed tomography and ERCP, which makes MRCP a promising alternative to diagnostic ERCP. [6][7][8][9] The administration of secretin improves ductal delineation and may allow an indirect estimation of the exocrine pancreatic function. Secretin (S)-MRCP provides parenchymal, ductal, and functional information within a single diagnostic modality for the comprehensive examination of the pancreas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the classifi cation is based on current knowledge of the etiology of chronic pancreatitis (reviewed by Etemad and Whitcomb 13 and Lankisch and Banks 40 ), epidemiological studies, [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] clinical long-term observations of the natural course of the disease, [1][2][3][4][5]10,46,[49][50][51][52] hypothetical concepts of the development of chronic pancreatitis, 7,9,53-57 recent genetic fi ndings, 6,58-77 insights gained from experimental studies and investigations revealing the mechanisms of fi brotic destruction of the organ, [15][16][17][18][78][79][80][81] and studies dealing with pancreatic imaging techniques. [28][29][30][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] …”
Section: Review Of the Literature In Support Of The M-annheim Classifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[86][87][88]90 The MRI technique is helpful in detecting early signs of chronic pancreatitis, 88 and MRCP after secretin stimulation improves visualization of the pancreatic main duct and pancreatic duct side branches, thereby providing signifi cant support in the detection of early and mild changes of chronic pancreatitis. 87 In general, morphologic fi ndings of chronic pancreatitis on MRI/MRCP are analogous to those seen on CT. 90 However, no consensus exists concerning the grading of MRI/MRCP imaging according to the Cambridge criteria.…”
Section: M-annheim Imaging Criteria Of the Pancreas Based On The Cambmentioning
confidence: 99%