2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3093819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of interface roughness in the transport and lasing characteristics of quantum-cascade lasers

Abstract: A density-matrix based theory of transport and lasing in quantum-cascade lasers reveals that large disparity between luminescent linewidth and broadening of the tunneling transition changes the design guidelines to favor strong coupling between injector and upper laser level. This conclusion is supported by the experimental evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 shows the effect of varying IFR parameters on the peak-to-valley (PVR) ratio calculated by the DM model. Interface roughness has been shown to have a significant effect on transport in unipolar devices 59 and can suppress gain almost completely in tall-barrier QCLs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 shows the effect of varying IFR parameters on the peak-to-valley (PVR) ratio calculated by the DM model. Interface roughness has been shown to have a significant effect on transport in unipolar devices 59 and can suppress gain almost completely in tall-barrier QCLs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Here, to estimate the effect of inter-and intra-subband scattering induced by asymmetric interfaces on our device performance under different polarities, we follow Ref. 14:…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous DM models of III-V BTC QCLs have reproduced experimental results by including only the upper laser level (ULL) and a subset of miniband states in their basis set, of which one is designated as the injector. 16 However, in practice multiple subbands may contribute significantly to interperiod tunneling in BTC QCLs. Our extended non-RWA DM model avoids the need for a priori selection of the optically-coupled transition and the injector subband, allowing us to use the semi-automated design approach described in Ref.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although semiclassical scattering-transport models can give good agreement with experimental results, 1,14 they neglect tunneling across barriers, and can predict unrealistically large spikes in current density and gain when electrons scatter between spatially-extended subbands. 15 By contrast, simplified density matrix (DM) models [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] account for tunneling, in addition to scattering, and include the effect of the optical field on the electron dynamics.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation