2022
DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2022.2049951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of internal marketing in Australian higher education sector: age, gender and job level as moderators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While social exchange theory is widely applied in various contexts such as buyer–supplier relationships in the supply chain (Ambrose et al , 2010), psychological contracts (Kingshott, 2006), contact drafting in buyer–supplier relationships (Stefan and Inge, 2005) and strategic flexibility (Young-Ybarra and Wiersema, 1999), investigating customer–service provider relationships with team-level constructs (such as team alignment and team performance) has not been much investigated, especially in the digital transformation context. A few past attempts on digitalization of businesses using social exchange theory (Salo et al , 2020; Asif et al , 2022) attempted to explain today’s changing business scenario. For instance, social exchange has positive impact on cooperating parties in the digital context, despite the fact that they may be socially distanced.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While social exchange theory is widely applied in various contexts such as buyer–supplier relationships in the supply chain (Ambrose et al , 2010), psychological contracts (Kingshott, 2006), contact drafting in buyer–supplier relationships (Stefan and Inge, 2005) and strategic flexibility (Young-Ybarra and Wiersema, 1999), investigating customer–service provider relationships with team-level constructs (such as team alignment and team performance) has not been much investigated, especially in the digital transformation context. A few past attempts on digitalization of businesses using social exchange theory (Salo et al , 2020; Asif et al , 2022) attempted to explain today’s changing business scenario. For instance, social exchange has positive impact on cooperating parties in the digital context, despite the fact that they may be socially distanced.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a context, social exchange theory is a suitable one as it focuses on the economic view and relates social relationships (as a series of social exchanges) using relational cost and benefits (Lambe et al, 2001;Jeong and Oh, 2017). Social exchange theory (Blau, 1964) has been used in explaining relational constructs (Lasrado et al, 2022;Asif et al, 2022), such as customer-provider relationship, trust and commitment, which in the early literature constituted the platform to explore long-term, successful relationship development among the relevant parties. However, only a few studies are articulating how these relational constructs (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the social exchange theory indicates that for people to make decisions, they depend on an "exchange" for a particular reward (Thibaut and Kelley, 2017). Based on this theory, previous studies have identified that employees weigh their job positions as reciprocity to determine the level of commitment to the firm (Asif et al, 2022). Thus, it can be seen that existing literature exhibits differences in hospitality employee work behavior according to their job level (Jung and Yoon, 2014;Oh et al, 2021); for example, it has been found that hospitality employees at different job levels may demonstrate different attitudes and behavior towards corporate social responsibility Technology adoption (Oh et al, 2021), environmental behaviors (Chou, 2014) and turnover (Tracey and Hinkin, 2008).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%