Abstract:Lacrimal canalicular trephination with Mini-Monoka stent insertion is an easy, monocanalicular and lesser invasive technique, which has never been reported earlier in literature. We conclude that this repeatable procedure has good anatomical and functional success rates with minimal complications as compared with the other available treatment modalities for lacrimal canalicular obstructions.
“…Outcomes of our study correlated well with the previous study by Zadeng et al who described canalicular trephination in 24 patients with common and distal canalicular blocks and reported an anatomical success of 91.67% and 83.33% of patients with absent epiphora indicating functional success at a minimum of 8-month follow-up. [ 31 ]…”
AIM:
This study aimed to compare the outcomes and efficacy of canalicular trephination with monocanalicular stenting and canaliculodacryocystorhinostomy (canaliculoDCR) with silicone intubation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A prospective comparative study was done in 30 patients (30 eyes) with common canalicular blocks who were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients underwent canalicular trephination with monocanalicular stenting and 15 patients underwent canaliculoDCR with silicone intubation. Common canalicular obstruction was diagnosed by preoperative syringing and the location of block was confirmed on probing. Stents were kept in both the groups for 3 months and followed up till 6 months postoperatively. Success was defined based on both anatomical and functional outcomes. Anatomical success was defined by the free passage of fluid on syringing with the fluid felt in the throat. Functional success was defined in terms of relief from epiphora based on the subjective opinion and its categorization by Kraft and Crawford's grading and the fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT).
RESULTS:
Eighty percent of eyes in canalicular trephination group and 73.3% of eyes in canaliculoDCR group were anatomically patent on syringing at the final follow-up. Sixty-six percent of eyes in trephination group and 53.3% in canaliculoDCR group were reported to have absent epiphora (complete recovery). Ten eyes in both groups had Grade 0 and 1 FDDT indicating a functional success of 66.6% in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Canalicular trephination can produce results comparable to canaliculoDCR with silicone intubation in cases of common canalicular blocks. The average duration of surgery is significantly less in canalicular trephination which gives this procedure an added advantage.
“…Outcomes of our study correlated well with the previous study by Zadeng et al who described canalicular trephination in 24 patients with common and distal canalicular blocks and reported an anatomical success of 91.67% and 83.33% of patients with absent epiphora indicating functional success at a minimum of 8-month follow-up. [ 31 ]…”
AIM:
This study aimed to compare the outcomes and efficacy of canalicular trephination with monocanalicular stenting and canaliculodacryocystorhinostomy (canaliculoDCR) with silicone intubation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A prospective comparative study was done in 30 patients (30 eyes) with common canalicular blocks who were randomized into two groups. Fifteen patients underwent canalicular trephination with monocanalicular stenting and 15 patients underwent canaliculoDCR with silicone intubation. Common canalicular obstruction was diagnosed by preoperative syringing and the location of block was confirmed on probing. Stents were kept in both the groups for 3 months and followed up till 6 months postoperatively. Success was defined based on both anatomical and functional outcomes. Anatomical success was defined by the free passage of fluid on syringing with the fluid felt in the throat. Functional success was defined in terms of relief from epiphora based on the subjective opinion and its categorization by Kraft and Crawford's grading and the fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT).
RESULTS:
Eighty percent of eyes in canalicular trephination group and 73.3% of eyes in canaliculoDCR group were anatomically patent on syringing at the final follow-up. Sixty-six percent of eyes in trephination group and 53.3% in canaliculoDCR group were reported to have absent epiphora (complete recovery). Ten eyes in both groups had Grade 0 and 1 FDDT indicating a functional success of 66.6% in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Canalicular trephination can produce results comparable to canaliculoDCR with silicone intubation in cases of common canalicular blocks. The average duration of surgery is significantly less in canalicular trephination which gives this procedure an added advantage.
“…0 for locating the level of LCO. The technique of measuring or finding the level of LCO has also been described by us [1,8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, Sisler and Allarakhia (1990) invented a lacrimal transcanalicular mini-trephine for treating LCO as an office-based procedure [6,7]. Its simple design and easy to use made Sisler's lacrimal trephine one of the most favorite instruments in the armamentarium of a dacryologist [1,5,8]. This trephine has attracted worldwide attention and has been used with success rates ranging from 52-92% [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its simple design and easy to use made Sisler's lacrimal trephine one of the most favorite instruments in the armamentarium of a dacryologist [1,5,8]. This trephine has attracted worldwide attention and has been used with success rates ranging from 52-92% [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This technique was described in one of the pioneering articles in 2014 in patients of idiopathic lower LCO with a satisfactory success rate (83.3%) over 8.6 months [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trephine has attracted worldwide attention and has been used with success rates ranging from 52-92% [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This technique was described in one of the pioneering articles in 2014 in patients of idiopathic lower LCO with a satisfactory success rate (83.3%) over 8.6 months [8].…”
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.