2006
DOI: 10.1175/jcli3667.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Land Surface Processes in South American Monsoon Development

Abstract: This study explores the role of vegetation biophysical processes (VBPs) in the structure and evolution of the South American monsoon system (SAMS) with an emphasis on the precipitation field. The approach is based on comparing ensemble simulations by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction general circulation model (GCM) in which the land surface parameterization in one ensemble includes an explicit representation of vegetation processes in the calculation of surface fluxes while the other does not [… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been listed as one of the major sources to generate small scale features in RCMs (Denis et al, 2002). Although at intraseasonal and seasonal scales, oceanic forcing may be the main source of climate variability over many regions, in places where land-atmosphere coupling is strong (Koster et al, 2006;Xue et al, 2004Xue et al, , 2006Xue et al, , 2010b, soil moisture and vegetation biophysical processes could make significant contributions to dynamic downscaling. Extreme climate events, such as droughts and flooding, are an important focus in RCM land/atmosphere interaction studies (e.g., Seth and Giorgi, 1998;Bosilovich and Sun, 1999;Zhang et al, 2003;Gao et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2013;Stefanon et al, 2013).…”
Section: Land Surface Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been listed as one of the major sources to generate small scale features in RCMs (Denis et al, 2002). Although at intraseasonal and seasonal scales, oceanic forcing may be the main source of climate variability over many regions, in places where land-atmosphere coupling is strong (Koster et al, 2006;Xue et al, 2004Xue et al, , 2006Xue et al, , 2010b, soil moisture and vegetation biophysical processes could make significant contributions to dynamic downscaling. Extreme climate events, such as droughts and flooding, are an important focus in RCM land/atmosphere interaction studies (e.g., Seth and Giorgi, 1998;Bosilovich and Sun, 1999;Zhang et al, 2003;Gao et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2013;Stefanon et al, 2013).…”
Section: Land Surface Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, such feedbacks can be understood as the degree to which the atmosphere responds to anomalies in the land surface state [15]. Soil moisture has been identified as a key variable in several studies and especially in the terrestrial segment of the hydrological cycle i.e., the evaporation-soil moisture interaction [4,[8][9][10]15,16]. Using Graph Theory, we verify the interdependences of several variables in the context of these complex interactions at interannual timescales.…”
Section: Visualizing Linear and Non-linear Dependences Using Graph Thmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The study of LAFs has been approached from physical models and numerical experiments [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]; analysis of observations and models with statistical tools [3,[14][15][16][17]; and traces of moisture trajectories [18,19], among others. An important body of literature has focused on the role of vegetation and land uses in the dynamics of LAFs [20][21][22][23][24], and the conditions under which LAFs determine the stability of the lower atmosphere [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the study of LAFs have been approached from physical modelling and numerical experiments [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]; analysis of observations and models with statistical tools [3,[14][15][16][17]; traces of moisture trajectories [18,19], among others. An important body of literature has focused on the role Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%