2013
DOI: 10.4161/epi.27536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of miRNAs and epigenetics in neural stem cell fate determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(177 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigating 14 of $40 miRNAs known to be expressed in brain tissue (Bak et al, 2008;Kapsimali et al, 2007), we found that miR-132 and miR-34 also showed increased expression levels upon loss of miR-107. However, miR-132 is involved in the control of neuronal identity rather than neurogenesis while miR-34, even if involved in neurogenesis, did not have significantly increased levels to justify the phenotype observed in the absence of miR-107 (Lopez-Ramirez and Nicoli, 2013). miR-9 function in neural progenitor proliferation is debated and controversial; however, consistent with our findings, the increased levels of miR-9 in NPCs exhibit prodifferentiation function in numerous organisms (Bonev et al, 2011;Delaloy et al, 2010;Zhao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Investigating 14 of $40 miRNAs known to be expressed in brain tissue (Bak et al, 2008;Kapsimali et al, 2007), we found that miR-132 and miR-34 also showed increased expression levels upon loss of miR-107. However, miR-132 is involved in the control of neuronal identity rather than neurogenesis while miR-34, even if involved in neurogenesis, did not have significantly increased levels to justify the phenotype observed in the absence of miR-107 (Lopez-Ramirez and Nicoli, 2013). miR-9 function in neural progenitor proliferation is debated and controversial; however, consistent with our findings, the increased levels of miR-9 in NPCs exhibit prodifferentiation function in numerous organisms (Bonev et al, 2011;Delaloy et al, 2010;Zhao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous data showed that miRNA synthesis and maturation consists of a stepwise process that is compartmentalized between the nucleus and the cytoplasm [28][29][30]. The pri-miRNA (primary miRNA transcript) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II in the nucleus, resulting in a transcript with a stem-loop structure of about 70 nucleotides, a 5 0 7-methylguanylate cap and a 3 0 -polyadenylated tail [30][31][32].…”
Section: Biogenesis Of Mirnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their interplays switch the bivalent states of proneuronal genes and multipotency genes such as neurogenins (Ngns), Pax6, Sox, Nkx2.2 and Ascl1 (Mikkelsen et al, 2007; Prozorovski et al, 2008) [review see (Nakashima, 2004)] and subsequently determine the fate and differentiation of the neuroprogenitor cells in the neuroepithelial layer. Epigenetic regulation of neurodevelopment is also regulated by small non-coding RNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs) that are known to regulate neural stem cell fate by targeting mRNA at post-transcription level and chromatin-remodeling pathways during embryonic and adult neurogenesis [review see (Lopez-Ramirez & Nicoli, 2013)]. The timing and regulation of the miRNA formation in the neuroepithelial cells relevant to neuronal differentiation remain allusive.…”
Section: Effect Of Epigenetic Alterations On Neurodevelopmentmentioning
confidence: 99%