1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb14213.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of muscarinic receptor subtypes in central antinociception

Abstract: 1 The ability to modify the pain threshold by the two M,-muscarinic agonists: AF-102B and by the specific M2-agonist arecaidine was examined in mice and rats by using three different noxious stimuli: chemical (writhing test), thermic (hot-plate test) and mechanical (paw pressure test).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reports have also provided evidence for the receptorial mechanism involved in the muscarinic antinociception. Literature data indicates that supraspinal cholinergic antinociception induced both directly, through muscarinic agonists, and indirectly, by enhancing ACh extracellular levels through cholinesterase inhibitors, is mediated by M 1 receptor stimulation, evidencing that M 1 muscarinic receptor subtype plays an essential role in the modulation of pain perception [2,11,12,20,23]. The involvement of the M 2 muscarinic receptor subtype in the induction of analgesia has also been postulated by using pharmacological antagonists [13] and by generating M 2 muscarinic receptor knockout mice [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have also provided evidence for the receptorial mechanism involved in the muscarinic antinociception. Literature data indicates that supraspinal cholinergic antinociception induced both directly, through muscarinic agonists, and indirectly, by enhancing ACh extracellular levels through cholinesterase inhibitors, is mediated by M 1 receptor stimulation, evidencing that M 1 muscarinic receptor subtype plays an essential role in the modulation of pain perception [2,11,12,20,23]. The involvement of the M 2 muscarinic receptor subtype in the induction of analgesia has also been postulated by using pharmacological antagonists [13] and by generating M 2 muscarinic receptor knockout mice [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several literature reports indicate that cholinergic antinociception induced both directly, through muscarinic agonists, and indirectly, by enhancing ACh extracellular levels through cholinesterase inhibitors, is mediated by M 1 receptor stimulation, evidencing that M 1 muscarinic receptor subtype plays an essential role in the modulation of pain perception (Bartolini et al, 1992;Iwamoto and Marion, 1993;Ghelardini et al, 1996;Naguib and Yaksh, 1997;Ghelardini et al, 2000). The involvement of the M 2 muscarinic receptor subtype in the induction of analgesia has also been postulated by using pharmacological antagonists (Gillbert et al, 1989) and by generating M 2 muscarinic receptor knockout mice (Gomeza et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been known that the direct and indirect activation of the cholinergic system produces analgesia in both animals (1,2,9,(16)(17)(18)21,23,24) and humans (20). Because sumatriptan is endowed with cholinergic antinociceptive properties and 8-OH-DPAT enhances ACh release, the goals of the present study were to explore whether other 5-HT 1A agonists, such as gepirone and 8-OH-DPAT, were able to increase the pain threshold in mice and then investigate whether a cholinergic mechanism underlies 5-HT 1A antinociception.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%