2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04376-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of mycorrhizal associations in tree spatial distribution patterns based on size class in an old-growth forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, AM plants accumulate relatively more pathogenic fungi in their mycorrhizosphere (55). Furthermore, in temperate and subtropical forests, EcM saplings and adult trees tend to exhibit positive density dependence, whereas AM trees show neutral density dependence (55)(56)(57). A combination of positive density dependence and differences in soil nutrition may lead to clustering of EcM tree seedlings around adult EcM trees and a lack of AM tree saplings around conspecific adult AM trees (19,57).…”
Section: Negative Microbial Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, AM plants accumulate relatively more pathogenic fungi in their mycorrhizosphere (55). Furthermore, in temperate and subtropical forests, EcM saplings and adult trees tend to exhibit positive density dependence, whereas AM trees show neutral density dependence (55)(56)(57). A combination of positive density dependence and differences in soil nutrition may lead to clustering of EcM tree seedlings around adult EcM trees and a lack of AM tree saplings around conspecific adult AM trees (19,57).…”
Section: Negative Microbial Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in temperate and subtropical forests, EcM saplings and adult trees tend to exhibit positive density dependence, whereas AM trees show neutral density dependence (55)(56)(57). A combination of positive density dependence and differences in soil nutrition may lead to clustering of EcM tree seedlings around adult EcM trees and a lack of AM tree saplings around conspecific adult AM trees (19,57). Over time, aggregation of individuals belonging to a single species can lead to monodominance (>60% of basal area or stems belong to a single species), which is a particularly common phenomenon in EcM plant communities (58).…”
Section: Negative Microbial Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used nine plant species: five AM-associated species (Magnolia obovata, Cerasus jamasakura, Viburnum dilatatum, Viburnum furcatum, and Aesculus turbinata) and four ECM-associated species (Pinus densiflora, Betula platyphylla, Quercus crispula, and Quercus serrata) [12][13][14][15][16]. The natural population densities of ECM-associated species are higher than those of AM-associated species (Table S1) [17].…”
Section: Experimental Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving stand size class distributions based on DBH measurements is commonplace in production forestry through to ecological surveys of stand biomass. Manual tree measurement and obtaining the geolocation data required to study size class distribution requires considerable resources and few studies include geolocation of individual trees within a study site [44]. Instead, a common field method for estimating the size class distribution is to extrapolate from sub-plots that may be 30 m × 30 m or less in size [45].…”
Section: Heterogeneity At Landscape/stand Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%