2004
DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960271106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of N‐acetylcysteine in prevention of contrast‐induced nephropathy after cardiovascular procedures: A meta‐analysis

Abstract: SummaryBackground: Contrast-induced nephropathy is one of the common causes of acute renal insufficiency after cardiovascular procedures.Hypothesis: The objective of this paper was to analyze the published data on the usefulness of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy after these procedures.Methods: Trials were selected if they were prospective, randomized, controlled, had selected patients with impaired renal function, used low-osmolality, nonionic contrast media intra-arterially… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purpose of the present investigation, however, the creatinine value taken for further study was the value at admission (thus excluding the possible influence of contrastinduced nephropathy 12 ). eGFR mL/min per 1.73 m 2 was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: GFR = 186× (serum creatinine) −1.154 × (age) −0.203 ×0.742 (in women), as described in the corresponding K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines.…”
Section: Glomerular Filtration Rate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of the present investigation, however, the creatinine value taken for further study was the value at admission (thus excluding the possible influence of contrastinduced nephropathy 12 ). eGFR mL/min per 1.73 m 2 was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: GFR = 186× (serum creatinine) −1.154 × (age) −0.203 ×0.742 (in women), as described in the corresponding K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines.…”
Section: Glomerular Filtration Rate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disparate results of these clinical trials have led to a proliferation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing the overall prophylactic efficacy of NAC. To date, at least nine meta-analysis of NAC have shown beneficial treatment effects in reducing RCIN [113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121] . However, six meta-analyses were inconclusive [122][123][124][125][126][127] .…”
Section: Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses Of The Efficacy Of Nacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Twelve other metaanalyses, which incorporated fewer studies, have been published, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and 7 of the 12 reported a benefit from NAC. 25,27,29,30,32,34,35 Although meta-analysis is considered the most accepted strategy to define conclusions from multiple trials, conflicting results between NAC meta-analyses highlight the possibility that this approach may still not provide resolution to clinical questions, especially when inclusion criteria differ between meta-analyses. Therefore, as discussed by Bagshaw et al, 36 meta-analyses are not always a panacea, and should be avoided if the trials to be included exhibit significant statistical or clinical heterogeneity, as is the case with studies involving NAC prophylaxis of CN.…”
Section: Oral N-acetylcysteinementioning
confidence: 99%