2009
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.h.01463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: Current uses of computed tomography-based and imageless navigation systems for total hip arthroplasty include proper placement of the acetabular component, measurement of limb-length changes, enablement of minimally invasive surgery, and proper placement of components for hip resurfacing procedures. This article provides an overview of the rationale for computer-assisted surgery in total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. The experience of the senior author (M.L.S.) with computer-assisted surgery for hip ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first hip navigation system was developed in 1992. The system requires a preoperative CT scan and registration of anatomic landmarks so the computer can determine where the pelvis lies in space [19]. There has been criticism of the navigation systems including the extra costs, additional radiation exposure, time-consuming preoperative planning, and intraoperative matching procedures [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first hip navigation system was developed in 1992. The system requires a preoperative CT scan and registration of anatomic landmarks so the computer can determine where the pelvis lies in space [19]. There has been criticism of the navigation systems including the extra costs, additional radiation exposure, time-consuming preoperative planning, and intraoperative matching procedures [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, it has only been used in normal or primary osteoarthritic hips. [10][11][12][13] It may not be applicable to hips with severe deformity secondary to developmental dysplasia or congenital dislocation. In addition, the TAL is difficult to visualise intraoperatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the acetabular component affects the results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in terms of 16 postoperative range of motion, dislocation, impingement, wear and osteolysis, and is also associated with 17 long-term implant survival [1][2][3][4]. Precise positioning of the acetabular components in the normal native 18 acetabulum also decreases shearing force on the component, and is thought to be ideal from a biomechanical viewpoint [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modification of the operative procedures and breakthroughs in implant 20 technology have made it possible to perform THA even in patients with severe deformities. However, it is 21 very difficult to place the acetabular component in the appropriate position in cases with severe acetabular 22 deformity either freehand or with a mechanical device because of the difficulty of identifying the 23 orientation around the acetabulum [3,6,7]. Although various navigation systems, including imageless, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%