2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of new imaging modalities in pursuit of the vulnerable plaque and the vulnerable patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also makes sense of prognostic valuation. Models within genetic variants for risk stratification in order to expand "area under curve" worth further research in precision medicine era [29][30][31]. Admittedly, the study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also makes sense of prognostic valuation. Models within genetic variants for risk stratification in order to expand "area under curve" worth further research in precision medicine era [29][30][31]. Admittedly, the study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the requirement for a second CTA obtained at the time of coronary PET imaging would not be practical or economically feasible, and incurs unnecessary additional radiation exposure. In carefully selected populations at exceptionally high risk of adverse events, 18 F-NaF PET could provide insight into the biology of atherosclerosis and may prove to be of importance in patient management 16,17 . It has been shown that the presence of vulnerable plaque features predicts acute coronary syndromes and in the absence of significant stenosis and coronary calcification, the likelihood of adverse events is very low 7, 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCTA focalizes attention on validated measures of plaque vulnerability. There is increasing interest and continuing debate on its potential role as a “noninvasive” method for (1) mapping coronary atherosclerosis, (2) better understanding the adverse features of coronary plaques, and (3) achieving potential benefits in guiding therapeutic interventions [ 58 ].…”
Section: Definition Of Vulnerable Plaque and Features By Cctamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using CCTA, in comparison with grayscale IVUS, calcified versus noncalcified plaque can be quantified on the basis of density cutoff values [ 61 ]. Low attenuation suggests high lipid content and has defined for attenuations below 30 Hounsfield Units (HU) [ 58 , 62 ] ( Figure 2 ). Different HU cut-off limits used in different laboratories presumably have weakened the estimated risk of ACS associated with LAP.…”
Section: Definition Of Vulnerable Plaque and Features By Cctamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation