2006
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00660.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of nitrosyl factors in the hindlimb vasodilation elicited by baroreceptor afferent nerve stimulation

Abstract: This study determined whether electrical stimulation (ES) of the baroreceptor afferent fibers in the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) produces hindlimb vasodilation in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats via the release of nitric oxide (NO)-containing (nitrosyl) factors from NO synthase-positive lumbar sympathetic nerve terminals. ES of the ADN (1-10 Hz for 15 s) produced frequency-dependent reductions in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and mesenteric and hindlimb vascular resistance (MR and HLR, respectively). The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that L-NAME did not interfere with the central actions of 5-HT or the central processing of autonomic outflow. We have also provided evidence that the systemic injection of a 25 µmol/kg dose of L-NAME did not interfere with central processing aortic depressor nerve or superior laryngeal afferent input (Possas et al, 1997, 2006). As such, it is unlikely that the ability of L-NAME to abolish the hindquarter vasodilation elicited by i.c.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that L-NAME did not interfere with the central actions of 5-HT or the central processing of autonomic outflow. We have also provided evidence that the systemic injection of a 25 µmol/kg dose of L-NAME did not interfere with central processing aortic depressor nerve or superior laryngeal afferent input (Possas et al, 1997, 2006). As such, it is unlikely that the ability of L-NAME to abolish the hindquarter vasodilation elicited by i.c.v.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…injection of 5-HT in rats pretreated systemically with a 25 µg/kg dose of the NO synthesis inhibitor, N G -nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME) (Moncada et al, 1991). This dose of L-NAME elicits robust hemodynamic responses, most likely by actions within microvasculature (see Davisson et al, 1996a), but does not appear to act in the brain since it did not interfere with central processing of afferent input regulating hemodynamic function (Possas et al, 1997, 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reasons for this discrepancy are unclear, it might be suggested that sympathetic withdrawal is not the sole mechanism of baroreflex vasodilatations in the hindlimb circulation and that active phenomena are also involved. It has indeed been shown that the hindlimb circulation of the rat receives a nitroxidergic innervation (8) that might be, at least partly, under baroreflex control (26). During stimulation of the aortic depressor nerve, both sympathetic withdrawal and active neurogenic vasodilatation could act in concert, evoking stronger vasodilatory effects in the hindlimbs than in the kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the vasodilation in the hindquarter bed of our pentobarbital-anesthetized rats may involve the relatively more pronounced down-regulation of α-adrenoreceptor-mediated vasoconstriction. It is also possible that the hindquarter vasodilation involves the activation of a unique neurogenic vasodilator pathway, which may release preformed pools of nitric oxide factors (Davisson et al, 1996a,b, 1997; Possas et al, 2006), with the capacity to directly dilate resistance arteries and blunt α-adrenoreceptor-mediated vasoconstriction (Nozik-Grayck et al, 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%