2020
DOI: 10.1186/s43055-020-0150-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of PET CT in comparison to triphasic CT in early follow-up of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoemoblization

Abstract: Background: The aim of the study is to compare the role of PET/CT and that of triphasic CT in hepatocellular carcinoma post chemoembolization evaluation, thus guiding clinicians for proper management strategy. Thirty patients who had transarterial chemoembolization done for HCC were subjected to both radiological modalities, 18 F-FDG PET/CT and triphasic CT, with the results compared. Results: In our study, triphasic CT revealed 20 true positive results, 3 true negative results, 7 false negative results, and n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative assessment of SUV ratio revealed that the optimal cut off value for discrimination between the residual HCC and the well ablated HCC was 1.09 with sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% and 87.5% respectively, near similar cut off value was noted in Hetta et al [14], who revealed that the optimal cut off value was 1, another study was done by Song et al [24], revealed a higher cut off value of 1.65, the more aggressive residual tumor growth in their study may explain the higher ratio of this study. The SUV ratio was considered as an independent predictor for HCC response after TACE [24].…”
Section: F Esupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantitative assessment of SUV ratio revealed that the optimal cut off value for discrimination between the residual HCC and the well ablated HCC was 1.09 with sensitivity and specificity of 88.9% and 87.5% respectively, near similar cut off value was noted in Hetta et al [14], who revealed that the optimal cut off value was 1, another study was done by Song et al [24], revealed a higher cut off value of 1.65, the more aggressive residual tumor growth in their study may explain the higher ratio of this study. The SUV ratio was considered as an independent predictor for HCC response after TACE [24].…”
Section: F Esupporting
confidence: 72%
“…FDG PET/CT detects the glucose metabolism of the tumors, providing unique information that cannot be detected from other conventional imaging techniques, and allows whole-body imaging and surveillance [10]. The diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of HCC is still controversial, especially in the well-differentiated HCC [11,12], yet later reports have described the favorable diagnostic performance of FDG PET in detecting metastatic and recurrent HCC [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%