2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of PET/CT in the evaluation of cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these studies the contribution of PET scan to treatment planning seems to be superior to CTscan due to its higher sensitivity for the detection of metastasis [32][33][34]36]. Yet, like CT-scans, the value of a PET scan is limited in the detection of pulmonary micro metastasis [35,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies the contribution of PET scan to treatment planning seems to be superior to CTscan due to its higher sensitivity for the detection of metastasis [32][33][34]36]. Yet, like CT-scans, the value of a PET scan is limited in the detection of pulmonary micro metastasis [35,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of PET/CT in cervical cancer patients include: assessing metabolic tumor activity and possible endometrial involvement, evaluating pelvic nodal involvement (even in cases with negative CT or MRI studies), detection of distant metastases where it can be used as a first imaging technique, radiation therapy planning of metabolically active lymph nodal lesions, identification of persistent/recurrent disease following neoadjuvant therapy and prognostication in terms of response-survival relationship. [91,92] Many studies have evaluated the role of FDG-PET in primary staging of cervical cancer and showed a variable sensitivity and specificity. [93,94] A recent meta-analysis by Havrilesky et al demonstrated a combined pooled sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 95%, respectively, for aortic node metastases, while similar values for pelvic node metastases were 79% and 99%, respectively.…”
Section: Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET has demonstrated its utility in the diagnosis of hepatic metastases [115][116][117], detection and staging in lung cancer [118,119], detection and staging in head and neck cancer [120], and detection of nodal involvement in cervical cancer [121]. For diagnosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers, FDG-PET has proven to be the most sensitive imaging modality compared to ultrasound, CT and MRI [122].…”
Section: Metastasis Detection and Therapy Adjustment By Mri Pet/ct Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the majority of tumors (such as head and neck, NSCLC, cervical cancer), metabolic PET was superior to CT in radiotherapy planning and assessment of therapy response [173]. Several studies have indicated that in responding tumors, FDG uptake markedly decreases within the first chemotherapy [16], [22], [23], [26], [28], [30], [31], [34], [89], [90], [107][108][109][110][111][112], [114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123] Patient and Treatment Selection [167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181], [195,196] DCE-MRI for antivascualr agents Assessment of tumor physiology (perfusion and permeability, Gd-IAUC and AUC, Ktrans, Ve)…”
Section: Changes Of Metabolic Activity By Novel Targeted Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%