“…However, conventional water treatment technologies to remove these notorious contaminants are fraught with challenges. , For example, PFCAs cannot be biodegraded by activated sludge treatment processes to any appreciable extent, while advanced oxidation technologies (AOTs), an effective method for treating pharmaceutical and personal care products, also exhibit limited removal efficiency for PFCAs. In particular, a hydroxyl radical ( • OH) with a redox potential of E ° = 2.72 V versus a normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) at 20 °C is only slightly reactive toward certain PFCAs ( e.g., trifluoroacetic acid, CF 3 CO 2 – and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), C 7 F 15 CO 2 – ) with low rate constants ( k , in the unit of M –1 s –1 ). , The reactivity of a sulfate radical (SO 4 •– , E ° = 2.5–3.1 V vs NHE at 20 °C) with PFCAs was reported to be in the range of 0.9 × 10 4 to 4.4 × 10 4 M –1 s –1 . , Thi et al revealed that only using UV 254 irradiation at 400 W, PFOA was degraded to 52.1% after 12 h of contact time, while simultaneously with UV 254 and carbonate radical (CO 3 •– ) treatment, PFOA was completely removed within the same time frame . The contact time of 12 h is not pragmatic for any realistic operation in wastewater treatment plants.…”