2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of pH on photolytic and photocatalytic degradation of antibiotic oxytetracycline in aqueous solution under visible/solar light: Kinetics and mechanism studies

Abstract: In this study, the photochemical degradation of the antibiotic oxytetracycline (OTC) at different pH values was investigated in aqueous solution under visible and solar light irradiation. Particular emphasis was given to the kinetics and mechanism during the photolytic and photocatalytic degradation of OTC. A comparative study of the photolysis of OTC under solar light, with different initial concentrations and in the presence of scavengers of reactive oxygen species (ROS), revealed a self-photosensitization p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(34 reference statements)
4
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution pH is an important parameter because it determines the surface charge properties of the catalyst, the charge of the pollutant and the adsorption of the pollutant onto the catalyst surface. 25 The effect of pH on the sonophotocatalytic degradation of DDVP was investigated in the range of 5. . As shown in Figure 4, after 240 min of irradiation, the COD Cr removal efficiency of DDVP were 54.19%, 63.13%, 59.74% and 60.70% at pH values of 5.3, 7.3, 9.1 and 10.3, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solution pH is an important parameter because it determines the surface charge properties of the catalyst, the charge of the pollutant and the adsorption of the pollutant onto the catalyst surface. 25 The effect of pH on the sonophotocatalytic degradation of DDVP was investigated in the range of 5. . As shown in Figure 4, after 240 min of irradiation, the COD Cr removal efficiency of DDVP were 54.19%, 63.13%, 59.74% and 60.70% at pH values of 5.3, 7.3, 9.1 and 10.3, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A desired concentration of DDVP was prepared by dissolving the 12 L of dechlorinated tap water aerated for 40 min at room temperature (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) o C). Then, the catalyst was added to the above DDVP solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decreasing reaction rates at pH 4.1, pH = 5.0 and pH = 6.0 experiments, 8.6 ± 0.5, 6.3 ± 0.2 and 2.3 ± 0.1 L -1 kJ, respectively, appear to reflect this relationship between the molar fractions of the referred iron-oxalate complexes and their respective quantum yields. On the other hand, the positive influence of increasing solution pH on OTC degradation by means of its solar/visible light absorption properties, as described by Zhao et al [43], did not seem to play a significant role in this process. Considering these results, the working pH of 5.0 was chosen for the subsequent set of experiments, since no extra dosage of oxalic acid was needed to obtain a satisfactory 49% mineralization of the initial DOC content, OTC was no longer for unadjusted pH0 and controlled pH0 = 5.0, respectively.…”
Section: Influence Of Initial Solution Phmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, according to Fig. 6b,the 1O2 reactive species also plays an important role in AMX self-photosensitization under UV/visible solar light, as reported by Zhao et al (2013).…”
Section: Influence Of Inorganic Ions and Scavengersmentioning
confidence: 93%