2014
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Photofunctionalization in Mitigating Impaired Osseointegration Associated with Type 2 Diabetes in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maintenance of surface hydrophilicity after implant placement is a critical factor during the wound healing and bone formation processes to achieve the most favorable outcome by enhancing interaction between the implant material and host cells. The short photofunctionalization treatment employed here was recently shown to result in accelerated and enhanced osseointegration similar to the longer UV-treatment times employed in earlier studies [29, 37, 38, 43]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maintenance of surface hydrophilicity after implant placement is a critical factor during the wound healing and bone formation processes to achieve the most favorable outcome by enhancing interaction between the implant material and host cells. The short photofunctionalization treatment employed here was recently shown to result in accelerated and enhanced osseointegration similar to the longer UV-treatment times employed in earlier studies [29, 37, 38, 43]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…UV irradiation leads to the modification of titanium implant surfaces from a hydrophobic to a superhydrophilic state and removes hydrocarbon contamination [17, 24, 25]. These extreme changes in surface properties have been studied extensively for their effect on enhancing osteoblast attachment and proliferation, which leads to greatly improved osseointegration of titanium implants [2629]. Despite this very encouraging extensive research regarding bone-implant integration, very little is known to date regarding the effect of photofuntionalization on bacterial attachment and biofilm formation on titanium surfaces despite its importance for lasting implant success [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All implants placed in tibias and femurs were unloaded. In detail, most authors reported significantly increased BIC [57,71,[73][74][75][76][77][78][79], push-in values [40,44,[80][81][82][83], bone volume [72,84], or bone mineral [85,86] were noted in all animal models studied for photofunctionalized groups disregarding implant surface modifications/topography. The differences were insignificant for both UV-treated and non-UV-treated reported in four animal studies [87][88][89][90].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the UVC light source was from a 15 W bactericidal lamp and exposure time ranging from 2 h to 48 h [72]. Some studies used photo-generated devices (Figure 3), which are available commercially to treat the implant surfaces at chairside, with an exposure time of only around 12-15 min [82,83,90]. The literature search found that several methods have been applied as the source of ultraviolet light with various wavelengths.…”
Section: Mongrel Dogsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Implant therapy-related complications such as disability and long-lasting dependence caused by implant loosening remain significant, [11][12][13] and unfavorable anatomical and physiological states of the host bone can preclude implant therapy. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Further, the protracted healing time required by implants to anchor into bone limits the application of implant therapy and reduces therapeutic benefit, particularly for dental implants. All these challenges are partially or largely attributable to the limited capability of implants to integrate with bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%